Tomi Van de Brooke, Chief of Staff to Supervisor Mary N. Piepho, attended the meeting and worked to answer questions from members as to the disposition of their funding.
"Tomi Van de Brooke gave a very good explanation of some of the things we have been questioning," said Watson.
At issue is an engineer's report done annually that takes up two-thirds of the committee's annual budget of $45,000.
"There are different parts about the costs of the engineer's report. Things we did not know we are paying for," Watson stated. The committee is drafting a letter to the county asking for a further explanation of the fees and services.
Another question raised during the discussion is the cost for county service charged back to the committee's budget.
"If the public calls the county and asks a question about Zone 36, they charge that back to the Zone 36 budget," said Watson.
Van de Brooke said that while calls are charged back, she doesn't think it occurs on an everyday basis.
"I hesitate to say that every call that comes in is charged to Zone 36," she claimed, "but if significant time is spent on an inquiry that type of activity would be charged to the zone."
Committee members were directed to discuss the engineer's report further with county staffers. Watson said if they are able to recoup some of that expenditure, it might free up some money for projects in Alamo.
"I don't know what's going to happen with this," she said. "It all depends on whether the county can do anything about the disproportionate amount we pay."
This story contains 345 words.
If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.
If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.