Town Square

Post a New Topic

Alamo roads in jeopardy!

Original post made by [removed], Alamo, on May 14, 2011

Dear Editor,

This story contains 227 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (3)

Like this comment
Posted by [removed]
a resident of Alamo
on May 17, 2011 at 7:10 am

Dear Editor,

Readers interested in the agendas, planning and approvals of the Tri Valley Transportation Council (“TVTC”) may contact:

Lisa Bobadilla
Transportation Division Manager, City of San Ramon
(925) 973-2651
lbobadilla@sanramon.ca.gov

Alamo residents that wish to voice specific direction to TVTC members may submit their comments to Ms. Bobadilla or contact:

Karen Basting
CCC District III Chief of Staff
(925) 820-8683
Karen.basting@bos.cccounty.us


Like this comment
Posted by [removed]
a resident of Alamo
on May 20, 2011 at 8:05 pm

Dear Editor,

UPDATE: TVTC vote on changing approvals from unanimous decisions has been delayed.

Tri Valley Transportation Committee (“TVTC”) members were quoted, “We are years behind where we should be for road development. We haven’t been able to get anything done because of “one area”. “A small group” is always stopping anything from happening.” In further investigation of San Ramon and Danville documents, there is an indicated desire to place the burden of the traffic north in the 24/680 corridor on Alamo and Lamorinda roads as overflow for the primary highways. “We must serve our residents’ demands for access north and south. Any inconvenience to a small group must be weighed against our cities’ needs.”

If your readers deal with the reality of plans attached to the ability for a majority of major cities to simply dictate their decisions on Alamo and Lamorinda, a clear reality illustrates why unanimous decisions must be preserved so at least Alamo can protect the corridor north. It is obviously important to add Lamorinda’s voice to these decisions through a consolidation of the 24/680 south corridor and simply nullify the limited perspective of TVTC members.

Is it possible that TVTC has found its end-of-life in value to our corridor?


Like this comment
Posted by [removed]
a resident of Alamo
on May 20, 2011 at 8:08 pm

Dear Editor,

UPDATE: TVTC vote on changing approvals from unanimous decisions has been delayed.

Tri Valley Transportation Committee (“TVTC”) members were quoted, “We are years behind where we should be for road development. We haven’t been able to get anything done because of “one area”. “A small group” is always stopping anything from happening.” In further investigation of San Ramon and Danville documents, there is an indicated desire to place the burden of the traffic north in the 24/680 corridor on Alamo and Lamorinda roads as overflow for the primary highways. “We must serve our residents’ demands for access north and south. Any inconvenience to a small group must be weighed against our cities’ needs.”

If your readers deal with the reality of plans attached to the ability for a majority of major cities to simply dictate their decisions on Alamo and Lamorinda, a clear reality illustrates why unanimous decisions must be preserved so at least Alamo can protect the corridor north. It is obviously important to add Lamorinda’s voice to these decisions through a consolidation of the 24/680 south corridor and simply nullify the limited perspective of TVTC members.

Is it possible that TVTC has found its end-of-life in value to our corridor?


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Mark Davis clearly is serious about Sin City Raiders
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 1,105 views

Next Up, The Election Props -- but first this word: We’re Number One!
By Tom Cushing | 4 comments | 472 views