Local Blogs

The Observer

By Roz Rogoff

E-mail Roz Rogoff

About this blog: In January 2002 I started writing my own online "newspaper" titled "The San Ramon Observer." I reported on City Council meetings and other happenings in San Ramon. I tried to be objective in my coverage of meetings and events, and...  (More)

View all posts from Roz Rogoff

Tassajara Valley's population could grow by 100,000!

Uploaded: Nov 22, 2010
Oops did I forget to say it is 100,000 DEAD PEOPLE? Dead people don't drive cars or attend public schools. So unless this is a George A. Romero movie, all of the dire predictions from "No on Measure W" won't happen.

Sid Corrie was the developer who originally considered 4200 houses for his properties in Tassajara Valley back in 1998. Those were the numbers thrown around by Seth Adams from the "No on Measure W" campaign, but those figures are totally obsolete since Corrie changed his plans from houses to burial plots in 2005.

Corrie is very proud of his proposed cemetery and considers it an improvement of the existing property. "It looks like a moonscape out there," Corrie told me over the phone, "We've been running cattle out there for many years." he explained.

Twelve years ago Curt Kinney was looking for a cemetery to bury his daughter who died suddenly on her wedding day. In February of 2004, the San Ramon City Council appointed Curt Kinney to the Tri-Valley Cemetery Task Force. The four cities in the Tri-Valley were looking for a place for eternal rest.

Kinney asked Sid Corrie, who owned several hundred acres of land in Tassajara Valley, about building a cemetery on some of his property. That started Corrie on a five-year quest to turn 200 acres of his property in Tassajara Valley into a cemetery for the Tri-Valley.

Corrie Development gave a presentation to the San Ramon City Council on Creekside Memorial Park at the Council's May 24, 2005 meeting. Corrie asked the City Council to adopt a resolution to encourage Contra Costa County to approve the project. San Ramon, Danville, Dublin, and Pleasanton each passed a resolution supporting the need for a local cemetery.

Now, after spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on an Environmental Impact Report, Corrie predicts the County Supervisors will vote to accept his cemetery plans by the middle of next year.

"We are requesting a use change not a zoning change, but we are going through the process as if it was a zoning change," Corrie told me in a meeting earlier today. Even though the property is 200 acres, only 60 acres will be developed. The surrounding 140 acres will be left open space.

Corrie gave me a copy of his plans for Creekside Memorial Park dated December 15, 2005, along with the Project Location and Description section from an Admin Draft of the EIR. This draft EIR took three years to complete.

"One and a half years was spent on water." Corrie said. "We are using a well that never goes dry. When they have shortages in Livermore, they drive up there to take water from that well."

Corrie's water sources are approved for the first three phases. If he cannot find more by phase 4, the County would require a "green landscape," or drought tolerant plants instead of grass.

Corrie considers the term "green landscape" inappropriate. He called it a desert landscape. However, it can be very attractive if done well. Two of my neighbors have drought tolerant front yards, and I'm planning to put one in later this year.

Corrie believes his cemetery would keep housing developments out of Tassajara Valley because, "Nobody wants to live near a cemetery."

Corrie was surprised to hear that Tom Koch is planning a small cemetery for the New Farm development just north of Creekside Memorial Park.

Corrie and Koch are not friends, but Corrie considers Koch "very smart" and good at what he does. Corrie felt that Koch will be better off under County Control than if Measure W had passed.

Corrie is already within the zoning laws in Contra Costa County, so he didn't care one way of the other about Measure W, but he couldn't understand why voters in San Ramon would prefer four County Supervisors with no attachment to San Ramon controlling Tassajara Valley over our own Mayor and City Council.

Stay tuned for Koch's side of the Tassajara Valley story in Part 2 next month.

Comments

 +  Like this comment
Posted by We Voted No, a resident of San Ramon,
on Nov 24, 2010 at 4:36 pm

For a developer, Sid Corrie displays an amazing lack of understanding about what urban growth boundaries are and what it would take for "four county supervisors" to actually break one to allow development in TV. Given the slant of this piece it seems Roz continues to struggle with that understanding as well. Maybe they both should have read something more than the city's taxpayer funded phony "newsletter" about Measure W. Thankfully San Ramon voters did & were smart enough not to fall for these same old scare tactics. Can't wait to read about how puppetmaster Koch is going to develop it all under our noses! What a load of hooey.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Dave, a resident of San Ramon,
on Nov 30, 2010 at 11:19 am

Good article Roz. You and Sid Corrie did hit the nail on the head. The 4200 homes Sid Corrie was referring to was a plan in the 90's that would also include Alamo Creek and other properties as well as the cemetery. Three times the amount of land just voted on was involved in that TVPOA presentation. You couldn't get 4200 or even 420 homes on the property that was referred to as the San Ramon Eastside Specific Plan. What exists in the area just voted on in November is steep slopes and open space. It also has a road that needs some safety concerns and widening.

You won't have long to wait on New Farm. The Environmental Impact Report financing just passed at the county in October on consent calendar without anyone from the public or the Board of Supervisors desenting.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Roz Rogoff, the San Ramon Observer,
on Nov 30, 2010 at 1:37 pm

Roz Rogoff is a registered user.

FYI, Dave, Tom Koch and his wife contributed over $3300 to re-elect John Gioia to Supervisory District 1. I plan to ask him about that if I'm able to schedule an interview with him on New Farm next week.



Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:

Follow this blogger (Receive an email when blogger makes a new post)

SUBMIT

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Vote YES on Measures 45, 46, & 47, NO on 48
By Roz Rogoff | 30 comments | 2,167 views

Prop 47: not perfect, just preferable.
By Tom Cushing | 2 comments | 863 views

The Vranesh situation heads to court
By Tim Hunt | 7 comments | 676 views