Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

A truly bad idea

Uploaded: Sep 17, 2013
The city of Richmond is embarking upon a truly bad policy.
A bare majority of the City Council approved a plan for the city to buy about 620 mortgages that are underwater—regardless of whether payments on the loan are current. If the mortgage holders refuse to sell, then the city will consider using eminent domain to seize the mortgages.
The city's goal is to buy a $400,000 mortgage for the current value of the property—say $200,000, and then help the owners refinance a loan for $190,000 and then use the firm, Mortgage Resolution Partners, to resell the paper. Homeowners would immediately have a bit of equity and likely have a lower interest rate because underwater mortgages are very difficult to refinance.
Of course, the mortgage holders would take a huge hair cut of questionable legality.
Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court opened the door government overreach like this when justices ruled in a 5-4 case (Kelo vs. the city of New London) that the city could condemn private property using eminent domain for redevelopment—not just public improvements like roads, schools that it had been the traditional uses.
Richmond's embrace of the concept, which Mortgage Resolution Partners has been shopping around the country in areas hit hard by the housing bubble popping, takes eminent domain into dangerous new areas. The city's politics are every bit as progressive as those in Oakland or Berkeley so expanding government reach and authority fits with the mindset of its leaders.
David Stark, public affairs director for the Bay East Association of Realtors, said "I think the Richmond City Council needs to be aware of the unfortunate, unintended consequences of the decision. The same banks that can make homeownership possible for people who want to put down roots in their community could look at Richmond as a potential liability and decide not to make loans there.
"That will make it harder for people to purchase homes in Richmond and not make it a better community."
Notably, Richmond is pursuing this policy as home prices have rebounded sharply, up 29 percent year-over-year, according to the Zillow index. Back in 2009, it was at $270,000 and fell to about $155,000 in 2011 before climbing back to $217,000 last month. The trend is positive and, if the city is patient, the market will continue to right itself. Government intervention likely will have the opposite effect.
Another note: Despite the political dustup, Richmond continues to market itself. The San Francisco Business Times contained a 24-page insert from Richmond touting the city as a great place to do business as well as visit. Missing was any comment on the city's soaring crime rate and neighborhoods that are best avoided. Nationally, 93 percent of cities are safer than Richmond. Would you want to take your business there?

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post
To post your comment, please click here to login

Remember me?
Forgot Password?
or register. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

CPRA: Balancing privacy, public's right to know
By Gina Channell-Allen | 3 comments | 1,396 views

and my friend here will have the kibble."
By Tom Cushing | 12 comments | 1,134 views

Job growth is driving housing prices
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 1,016 views

Sentinels of Freedom Newsletter
By Roz Rogoff | 0 comments | 692 views