Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

Time to let the Raiders go

Uploaded: Aug 7, 2014
One of the great misnomers is that the Oakland Raiders organization cares about the East Bay.
If you believe that, I have a bridge from Hawaii to China that I am happy to sell you.
When Al Davis abandoned a loyal fan base in the 1990s to seek greater fortune in SoCal, he should have burned his bridges in Alameda County and Oakland forever. He played financially successful games in SoCal—remember Irwindale and the multi-million payment when a stadium was not built. That turned Al's attention back north. Thanks to politicians and other civic boosters, they bought him and the Raiders back.
What happened is a business school case study for a train wreck. The public—Alameda County and the City of Oakland—invested millions to rebuild the Coliseum—greatly irritating the Oakland A's. What's worse is that the deal required the Coliseum authority—through a subsidiary—to sell the tickets—not the team. The pols and others involved in the deal assumed the seat licenses would quickly sell out—Oops.
The Raiders controlled the quality of the product (the team) and the ticket prices—while the pseudo-public agency had to sell the tickets. The monumental problems were predictable.
I was present in a meeting when a Raider marketing official said he could only sign off to promotions that built the brand and were not directed at selling tickets. Yes. That's the deal pols agreed too.
Re-negotiations eventually made the team responsible for ticket sales and thus you have seen increased outreach and promotions to try to fill seats for a team playing pretty poor football most seasons (that's being charitable).
Fast forward to today. Owner Mark Davis has a year left on his lease agreement and the A's—after way too many machinations between pols in Oakland and the county—have reached an agreement on a 10-year lease. Of course, the new 10-year deal with the A's allows the authority to break the lease if there is an agreement to build a football stadium.
That leaves Davis hanging—he can try to make a deal to jointly use the 49ers new stadium in Santa Clara or get out of Oakland. Look for the later .There is precious little chance of a new football stadium in Oakland.
The 49ers move locked up the corporate money in the Silicon Valley and certainly will help their strong base on the Peninsula crowd.
That leaves the Raiders with the tiny Oakland/East Bay corporate community. If you were Workday based in Pleasanton, would your key clients rather go to the Niners or the Raiders—or the A's or the Giants?
Davis was checking out San Antonio, which already has a usable stadium in the Alamodome. He likely would require a new stadium and San Antonio is closer to Dallas and those Cowboys that San Jose is to L.A.
Slip on your business hat and try to consider the Raiders today versus the championship teams that were heavily involved in the community in the 1980s. That's 40 years ago.
Other than the name and the logos, there is almost no similarity between the pre-LA Raiders and the team today. Mark Davis has taken steps improve the operation.
Consider the charitable donations—something foreign to the Raiders. Both the 49ers and the Giants established foundations in 1991 and often routed corporate sponsorship promotions (field goals, touchdowns, etc.) through the foundations. The 49ers have given away $26 million, while the Giants have granted $19 million.
The A's, according to the San Francisco Business Times (the source of these numbers) have given $500K per year. The Raiders have neither a foundation nor a giving program—the San Francisco Business Times lists no total for corporate gifts. In my pretty broad charitable experience, that would be accurate and reflect the interest in the community beyond selling tickets.
To finance a new Oakland football stadium, officials have said there's a funding gap of about $600 million. That would be on top of the more than $100 million that the county and city of Oakland are paying on bonds from the 1995 construction of Mt. Davis on the east side of the Coliseum. Some of the elected officials are asking the right questions about whether pouring hundreds of millions into a facility that is designed to be used 10-12 times per year makes financial or even P.R. sense.
So, other than a bunch of folks who like to dress-up and act out in the end zone, what is the public interest in keeping the Raiders? Bid them adieu and hope the door hits them in the butt as they depart. They have sucked enough out of Alameda County in the last 20 years.



Comments

Posted by Will Rogers Never Met Al Davis, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood,
on Aug 7, 2014 at 11:39 pm

Or Mark Davis.

"Professional" Football is just a bunch of hired thugs anyway, not a local team.

I agree with Tim Hunt, but wish we could get them to pay back what they've swindled!


Posted by Jack, a resident of Downtown,
on Aug 8, 2014 at 10:55 am

Tim, the Raiders left for Los Angeles in the early 1980's after what was proved in court multiple times to be a conspiracy between Pete Rozelle and Oakland Officials to illegally keep them in an antiquated Oakland Coliseum. And if the Raiders are solely to blame for their current situation, why are the Warriors leaving? And why are the A's trying to leave?


Posted by Phil, a resident of Castlewood,
on Aug 8, 2014 at 1:49 pm

There is so much football to watch on my flatscreen even with the free OTA HD antenna I use. Then there's the Red Zone channel I pirate via the internet that I can afford to see the Raiders depart. I only have so much time to waste on the couch.


Posted by Libertarian, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood,
on Aug 8, 2014 at 5:55 pm

Get a load of this enormous coach potato trying to tell the Raiders organization what to do with its profits. Last time I looked, Timboat, I didn't see required charitable donations listed anywhere in the Constitution. Al Davis picked himself up from his bootstraps, perhaps its time for those who rely on charity to do the same. Don't they already receive enough from GOVERNMENT charity, aka my tax dollar?


Posted by Hy Storyan, a resident of another community,
on Aug 9, 2014 at 2:24 pm

The LA era was 1982 - 94.


Posted by Hey Timmy, I Believe! , a resident of Ruby Hill,
on Aug 11, 2014 at 12:39 am

Hey Tim! I truly do believe the Oakland Raiders organization cares about the east bay! Now, seriously, what is this bridge from Hawaii to China you own? I have plenty of money (note my neighborhood) to buy such a bridge! Please give me more information regarding this bridge of yours. If maybe, as I expect, you don't own this bridge, why would you lie to all of your readers about having it? Will you be brave enough to answer my comment? Lol... doubt it...


Posted by Not all are Thugs, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood,
on Aug 11, 2014 at 9:01 am

A better term is "Mercenaries"
who will work for the highest bidder and care nothing about the city they may be near.

Most of them
give the rest a bad name.

And I'll bet the freeways in SF are a lot better to travel on,
now that the traffic jam they call a football team took the name and the game and went south to Santa Clara.


Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on Aug 11, 2014 at 6:31 pm

Denver Bronco fans know the Oakland Raiders fans are released convicts.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Prop 46: Two Bridges Too Far
By Tom Cushing | 21 comments | 1,607 views

The valley loses a distinguished and humble leader
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 1,047 views

My secret identity is revealed!
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 1,011 views