Sunol Valley golf courses to close | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | DanvilleSanRamon.com |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

Sunol Valley golf courses to close

Uploaded: Dec 15, 2015
Bad news last week for public course golfers with the announcement that the Sunol Valley Golf Club is closing after nearly 50 years.
The 36-hole complex was routinely a site for large tournaments because of its capacity. The addition of several new golf courses over the last 15-20 years (Poppy Ridge with 27 holes in Livermore, the Course at Wente Vineyards, Dublin Ranch, the Bridges and Callippe Preserve in Pleasanton) has broaden the options for players.
Sunol remained a good value, but you can play Dublin Ranch during the week for the same amount of money and get a course that generally is in excellent condition. It’s similar at Callippe, while Poppy, Wente and the Bridges all are designed for higher green fees with service and conditions to match.
The competition for all courses stiffened during the recession when country clubs, seeing membership drop, sharpened their pencils significantly when bidding for the tournament business.
To compete, Sunol needed to be redesigned and updated, but that would be a huge capital expense for a complex that has seen its rounds plummeted from 130,000 in the late 1990s to less than 68,000 (about what Callippe is doing annually with 18 holes. Throw in, according to a Bay Area Newspaper Group Report, that the costs of water have soared 500 percent in the last four years.
The land is leased from the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and is irrigated with Hetch Hetchy system water. It is about halfway through a 25-year lease.
The challenge for the PUC, should no new operator emerge, is what to do with the land other than let it become open space surrounding a large clubhouse building that likely could continue to operate as an event center.
It’s not the only older Tri-Valley course with an uncertain future.
Last week, the Livermore City Council delayed a final decision on what to do with the now-closed Springtown nine-hole course. The previous operator ceased operations this fall telling the city it cannot continue to run the course with the mounting losses. The operator was a landscaping company, not a golf course firm. Springtown has never been close to the caliber of city’s municipal complex at Las Positas, but it fit a niche for older golfers who wanted to play a leisurely round and those learning the game.
Public Works Director Darren Greenwood has been telling concerned Springtown residents since the summer that he would recommend the course be closed and it would become brown space that would be mowed four times a year.
The council decided to pursue two paths: a privately-funded redevelopment of the homeowners’ association’s clubhouse and facilities that could produce enough money to possibly allow the golf course to continue operations; or make it open space that is available to the public.
For homeowners with backyards made up of the golf course, golfers are much preferable. Any open space, particularly the brown space that the city originally was planning, would mean an immediate plunge in housing values.
The golf course suffered financially because the drought took away its normal source of water from winter runoff and the city charged full retail for water from a fire hydrant. If the city had done what Pleasanton did—rent a water truck to provide recycled water—the finances would look a lot better. That was about 40 percent of the loss—paying retail for potable water used for irrigation.
Having attended a couple of meetings with the Springtown association folks, I think there is a middle ground that includes an assessment district for residents bordering the golf course with better management coming from the city or a private operator. The operator is going to need lots more cooperation from the city—such as help with the water and, perhaps, a modest subsidy.

One additional note: nobody wanted the 85 acres used even partially for housing. So, Councilman Stu Gary proposed a citywide vote that would lock that up in perpetuity unless the citizens voted to change it.
This is unnecessary and ties the hands of future city councils. At one level, it is a neighborhood issue—not a citywide concern. The golfers can come from anywhere, but those affected live in Springtown. Secondly, there’s no need to submit items like this to voters—it is a City Council matter and voters can change council members every two years.

Comments

 +   2 people like this
Posted by Johnny Smoke, a resident of Livermore,
on Dec 15, 2015 at 1:27 pm

So, Sunol closes due to lack of play (50% reduction) and water costs WITH proper management, but Springtown's problem is not declining rounds (73% reduction), but improper management?

Does the phrase "cognitive dissonance" mean anything to you?


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on Dec 15, 2015 at 3:57 pm

Michael Austin is a registered user.

Phoenix Arizona, 1964.
Nine hole golf course just off of Bethany Home Road
My first and only time on a golf course.
The third hole I hit a hole in one.
The very next hole, I put two balls in the water.
Enjoyed it, always meant to get back to it, never did.


 +   2 people like this
Posted by No water waste, a resident of Downtown,
on Dec 16, 2015 at 10:15 am

No golf course should ever be allowed to waste water on grass. They can truck reclaimed water in but should never be allowed to irrigate. No matter what the water situation.


 +   1 person likes this
Posted by Wut?, a resident of Livermore,
on Dec 16, 2015 at 3:52 pm

So Springtown residents want some welfare from the city so their real estate values can stay artificially high?

Maybe the residents of Springtown should have taken up golf.


 +  Like this comment
Posted by Michael Jones, a resident of Los Cerros Middle School,
on Dec 18, 2015 at 11:08 pm

I enjoyed over read your blog post. Your blog have nice information, I got good ideas from this amazing blog. I am always searching like this type blog post. I hope I will see again..
Web Link


 +   2 people like this
Posted by BubbaBighatt, a resident of Livermore,
on Dec 20, 2015 at 5:28 pm

No golf course should be allowed to "waste" water on grass? Where do you think the water goes, after it is put on the grass? After it is flushed down the toilet? Down the shower drain? It's never used up, it just gets recycled over and over and over and over again.


 +   1 person likes this
Posted by Medical Thesis Help, a resident of Alamo,
on Feb 1, 2016 at 9:10 pm

I appreciate this work amazing post for us I like it.
Web Link


Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Assemblyman proposes driving up housing costs to delight unions
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 1,138 views

“Give Me Liberty AND Give Me Death”?
By Tom Cushing | 6 comments | 326 views

Women’s History Month
By John A. Barry | 6 comments | 268 views

My New Letter to President Trump
By Roz Rogoff | 5 comments | 192 views