News

Budget crunch claims victims in Contra Costa County

Human services departments see heavy cuts, more to come

In an effort to slow or stop the financial hemorrhaging in Contra Costa County, members of the Board of Supervisors voted on Tuesday to amend their budget to reduce spending by $18.5 million. Caught in the crossfire of what is necessary and what can be provided are children and the elderly, as more 200 positions throughout the county will be lost.

At their Dec. 9 meeting, supervisors were brought face to face with the people who would be most affected by these cuts. More than 270 people packed into the board room in Martinez, with better than 100 of them asking for time to speak to the board and plead with the supervisors to find another way.

New County Administrator David Twa outlined that the situation for Contra Costa County stems from many factors, one of them the state of California's massive deficit and the efforts of lawmakers to balance the budget. "As you know," he explained, "what happens too often is these things roll down hill."

As lawmakers reduced the funding for many local agencies and projects, it has created a greater demand on the county to provide funding, and with revenues drying up that is becoming a greater and greater challenge. And it's only going to get worse. Twa is forecasting that assessed property values next year will continue to decrease, as much as 8 percent.

As a result, Twa said he plans to meet with all department heads in January to examine the possibility of consolidation of services. In February he will be back before the board with further cuts in the area of $10 million to $24 million.

"It is bleak, it is difficult. There are no easy solutions for this year or next year," Twa said. "We're trying to balance the needs of our employees with the need to provide services as the economy continues to decline."

Officials looked toward the area of Employment and Human Services as an area to cut because that department receives less state and federal funding, forcing the county to make up the difference. Department Director Joe Valentine examined their budgets, looked at positions that were both staffed, and unstaffed and offered up a proposed reduction in the workforce.

The plan will call for deep cuts in Child Protective Services and Adult Protective Services. A total of 200 positions will be eliminated, with layoffs occurring as of Dec. 31.

"This is the most painful proposal I've ever submitted in my entire career," Valentine stated.

The supervisors briefly looked at the possibility of a mandatory furlough for all non-emergency county personnel in order to save money, effectively shutting down county government a few days during the year and forcing employees to take unpaid leave on those days. However, the furloughs would have to receive union approval.

Public comment on the resolution lasted more than three hours, with each speaker allotted two minutes. Many spoke of the work done by the social workers employed by the county, the lives they've saved, the children they've protected. And they spoke of how cutting back on their departments will put the children and the seniors in the county at risk.

Under the proposed cuts, Adult Protective Services would see its workforce reduced from 14 caseworkers to five. APS worker Valorie Van Dahl said the cuts come at a time when caseloads are continuing to increase. Van Dahl said one of the most profound problems they are facing is financial abuse.

Van Dahl said that each year seniors in California lose $4.8 billion in cash and assets. In Contra Costa County she said that amount would be around $134 million. "Most of the people this happens to are good people," she said. "They are lonely, they are befriended, and they become victims."

David Mitchell, a 69-year-old Danville resident, called on the board to rethink cutting funding for the foster care system in Contra Costa County, calling it "the best of the best." Mitchell and his wife have fostered 400 children over 39 years and he said the county's program has become the model for the rest of the nation.

Some spoke about how the system saved their lives, others talked of the lives they've seen changed, some brought pictures of their families.

After the public comment finished, board members briefly discussed the furlough option before voting 5-0 in favor of the cuts. District 3 Supervisor Mary Piepho said even though board members appreciated the words of all those who spoke, in the end they had little choice but to approve the spending cuts. "We can't spend money we don't have. And we're not getting it locally, and we haven't been getting it from the state for years."

Piepho said part of the problem is that the state has continued to mandate programs and services but is only funding them at the 2001 level, which has created a funding gap that has grown to $33.2 million annually.

"The gap keeps increasing each year," she explained, "and we've been backfilling it, but we just can't backfill anymore."

"If we're flat now and we're going to lose another 2-8 percent next year, you're going to keep seeing these efforts and actions," she added.

Comments

Posted by B Lynn Goodwin, a resident of Danville
on Dec 14, 2008 at 8:57 pm

I understand there is no money for social services, but it's hard to imagine the long-term consequences of these cuts. I wonder who/what will fill the void.

B. Lynn Goodwin
www.writeradvice.com


Posted by Hal Bailey, a resident of another community
on Dec 16, 2008 at 4:39 pm

Dear Dolores,

The Fiscal Crisis at the state and county level has been thoroughly studied by talented analysts, as Diablo Vista region neighbors, and Ms. Goodwin raises only one issue of the impact this crisis will have at the county level. The cascade of issues impacting revenue come from state and county impact on all your readership region in the areas of public safety, public works, education, child services, elder services and much of our lifestyle supplied by governments.

Use your exceptional journalism and incredible writing talents to inform us all of the costs this crisis will bring in 2009/2010. We, as all neighbors, must realize that the cost of recovery will be borne by neighborhoods. Neighbors simply want to know the costs and how to succeed in investing in recovery and our future.

No one is insulated from this crisis and we appreciate your workload with fewer reporters and greater demand for all news. I cannot imagine a more important story for all readers.

Please,

Hal


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

David Brooks at his Best and Worst
By Tom Cushing | 11 comments | 953 views

Anti-fracking folks rail against railroads
By Tim Hunt | 34 comments | 875 views

Spedowfski Announces run for Livermore City Council
By Roz Rogoff | 1 comment | 600 views

Be an Exhibitionist!
By John A. Barry | 5 comments | 277 views