News


Slithery surprise greets Alamo man in his yard

An Alamo resident stepping outside for a quiet glass of wine instead found a stressful surprise. Rich Conti said on Sept. 4 he and his wife were in the back yard when their dog Louie suddenly began barking and they discovered a 4-foot-long rattlesnake.

"The dog started barking and then I heard the rattle and looked for it," said the Bryan Meadow resident.

He found the huge rattlesnake lying in the dirt near his back steps, coiled up, its rattle sounding a warning. Conti said the first thing he did was keep Louie away from the agitated reptile.

Once the dog was safely away, Conti went to get his "snake grabber," a pole with a clamp on the end designed to immobilize a reptile without getting close to it.

"We live at the foot of Mount Diablo and occasionally there are snakes," he explained. "My neighbor had one and I thought it was a good to have around if there was a snake, so I bought one on eBay."

Grabbing the snake and disposing of it were two different things, however. Conti said he was able to get the jaws of his tool around the snake's midsection, but that it took all of his strength just to hold onto the creature.

"It was much bigger and stronger than I'd ever seen. I had to hold it with two hands," he recalled. "It was scary for a little while. The thing was so big and it was angry."

Once he had control, he took the snake to the front of his house and there waited for help from a neighbor.

"My wife wouldn't come close to it - or me as long as I was holding it," he said with a laugh. "She called the neighbors but no one was around."

Eventually, Conti said, she brought him a shovel and he was able to hold the snake's head down on the ground until his neighbor Bob Oxenburgh came over and they were able to kill it.

"I couldn't believe how big and strong it was," he said. "It was pretty threatening."

Lindsay Wildlife Museum Wildlife Rehabilitation Director Susan Heckly identified the snake as a larger than usual Western Rattlesnake. Heckly said while the snake usually can be very thick through the body, they usually only measure about 3 feet in length.

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by James
a resident of Danville
on Sep 23, 2009 at 8:29 am

Great story ... I found that if one substitutes just about any politician in place of the snake, it still makes for a really good story!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by JH
a resident of Rancho Romero Elementary School
on Sep 23, 2009 at 9:03 am

How sad it is to have killed a great rodent preditor.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mike
a resident of Danville
on Sep 23, 2009 at 9:03 am

Why not call animal control and have the snake released up on Diablo? They are part of the ecosystem and help keep the rodent population under control. Shame they decided to kill it. We get all kinds of snakes including rattlers around our development. We always let them make their way to the open space.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sam
a resident of Danville
on Sep 23, 2009 at 9:12 am

I stand with JR!
Too bad you had to kill it! It may have slithered right into a closed box with a "cave opening" to hide. This wonderful animal could have been relocated without KILLING it!
Please people, call Lindsay Wildlife Museum for help befor killing any of our wild life.
Sad Sam


 +   Like this comment
Posted by neighbor :-(
a resident of Alamo
on Sep 23, 2009 at 9:31 am

Rich Conti! I am outraged!!
Think man! How hard and strong would you fight if you had your neck was in a noose? Think again!!
This magnificent serpent didn't attack you or even your barking dog. Building your home in serpent territory comes with responsibilities.
Rattle snakes don't stalk people. Be aware– take care– and let be those that were meant to be free.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Michael
a resident of Walnut Creek
on Sep 23, 2009 at 9:40 am

This is in response to Mike's comment. My home backs up to the open space and I am not surprised to hear this story at all. 1 week ago to date there was a young, (1 1/2yo) two foot long rattler at the base of our front stairs, it was immobile because the sun had gone down and getting cool out so, I sat and watched it while my wife called vector control to retrieve it, my son in the meantime went for his air soft pistol and said "just in case". I was crystal clear that I did not want to harm this snake and told my son to put his pistol away. Vector control showed up within the hour, he got out of his van, grabbed his pole and a plastic bag (red flag) and got the snake into the bag, with quite a fight to get it in there. I asked what was going to be done with the snake and his response was "euthanize it". He continued by saying that Mt. Diablo has more than it's share of rattlers and that is why we are starting to see more of them. I pick up spiders and put them outside sometimes, I leave them alone but when this guy gave me this information, I thought maybe I should pay attention before someone in my family is hurt. Mike, I was in the same position you are until it happened to me. Rich, thank you, your quick action could quite possibly have saved someone from a snake bite.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Debby
a resident of Monte Vista High School
on Sep 23, 2009 at 1:11 pm

Sorry people--in our neighborhood we have lots of small children and pets---the snakes need to be eradicated, not given a free ride to another area.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Danville Neighbor
a resident of Danville
on Sep 23, 2009 at 2:57 pm

Come On People! This is a 6-foot rattler, which is VERY dangerous!

Can you imagine a child or pet coming across this snake? It took 2 adult men to kill this snake, it easily could have seriously harmed or killed a kid. I 100% agree with the decision to kill this snake.

On a final note - I am just glad this mother of a snake was far away from my snake-less (I hope) home in Danville.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by cardfark
a resident of Diablo
on Sep 23, 2009 at 4:09 pm

I wondered why "Rick" hadn't been posting lately!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Citizen Paine
a resident of Danville
on Sep 23, 2009 at 4:11 pm

Professional courtesy is dead!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by A Live Coward
a resident of Danville
on Sep 23, 2009 at 5:01 pm

We all have our fears. Mine is snakes of all makes and models. (Also Republicans, but that's another story). Mr.Conti did the right thing under the circumstances. I have called the Lindsay Wildlife Museum in the past for "wild Life" help, but their response time is not quick enough to be useful under these circumstances.

Finally, I think that Danville has a "huge" Cougar problem that needs to be addressed. I suggest closing all bars after at 8pm on weekends. That may also have an indirect affect on the snake problem.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Common Sense
a resident of Alamo
on Sep 23, 2009 at 6:47 pm

Are you guys kidding me? While I completely agree it is unnecessary to kill things for no reason, Rich had more than enough cause. There is a dangerous animal living in his backyard where his family resides every day. Do you think the snake would have thought twice about biting Rich if he was in the snakes territory? Absolutely not. When animals grow way beyond their average size (as seen in this case) that is a sign of a healthy habitat for that particular species. Clearly rattlesnakes are doing just fine in the east bay. Rich acted just as I hope everyone would have acted in his situation...thinking about the safety of his family, neighbors, and friends above all else.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Neighbor
a resident of Alamo
on Sep 23, 2009 at 8:58 pm

Rich, way to protect our area. Thanks, you did the right thing for sure....


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Kev Freeman (father of Frankie)
a resident of another community
on Sep 24, 2009 at 9:15 am

Good for you, Rich! As someone who might well be dropping in on you from the UK in a few weeks time, I'm all for any wine drinking being free from snake bites! Nice photo, by the way...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mr. Mustang
a resident of Monte Vista High School
on Sep 24, 2009 at 1:46 pm

Chopped off the head??? That is just terrible terrible terrible Mr. Conti and neighbor friend. You should have figured out a way to kill it and keep it all in one piece...that thing is garage trophy!!!

"If you believe it you can achieve it"


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Matt
a resident of another community
on Sep 24, 2009 at 2:54 pm

If there is a giant black widow in your house, do you call somebody to come get it? No, you kill it!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ron
a resident of Danville
on Sep 24, 2009 at 5:00 pm

O.K. I will not kill anymore snakes as I have done in the past. All those who want the snakes, please post your address and next time I will throw them over your fence into your yard for safe keeping.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Duffy
a resident of Danville
on Sep 25, 2009 at 8:35 am

This is one of the funniest collection of reactions I have read in a long time. I especially liked
the one "We all have our fears. Mine is snakes of all makes and models. (Also Republicans, but that's another story)" The die-hard libs never miss a chance to inject a little political sarcasm into an otherwise rational discussion, But then perhaps it was because the rattle snake was hiding in the BUSHES!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Marie
a resident of Danville
on Sep 25, 2009 at 9:15 am

I'm with you Ron!!! Great comment!!!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sarah
a resident of Alamo
on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:26 am

All of you who say he shouldn't have killed the deadly snake, are you saying that next time he finds a rattler he can come put it in your backyard?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ron
a resident of Danville
on Sep 25, 2009 at 10:50 am

Marie,
I thought that would put this debate to rest for all the rattle snake lovers. What I cant understand, some people have more feelings for a rodent or animal than they do for humans.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Grateful Neighbor
a resident of Alamo
on Sep 25, 2009 at 11:25 am

Thank you Rich for protecting our neighborhoods! I have a feeling there is going to be a run on snake grabbers on ebay!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Susie
a resident of Danville
on Sep 25, 2009 at 12:12 pm

I live off El Cerro and found a very large rattlesnake in my yard a few years ago. I called both the Danville police and Animal Control but NO ONE would come get it. The police said "call Animal Control" but Animal Control never showed up. My neighbor finally killed the snake. I'm with Ron: "All those who want the snakes, please post your address and next time I will throw them over your fence into your yard for safe keeping."


 +   Like this comment
Posted by A Hayward Resident
a resident of another community
on Sep 25, 2009 at 2:40 pm

Thank God for Rich Conti keeping that snake from slithering its way into my hood. God forbid any drug dealers getting bit!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Citizen Paine
a resident of Danville
on Sep 25, 2009 at 3:45 pm

Move over, Sully. Conti for Town Council!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by who me?
a resident of Diablo
on Sep 26, 2009 at 7:03 am

you're all a bunch of wimps. walk around the serpent and let it live. and by the way, when's the last time anyone actually has been bitten by a rattler in this area? if it happened, it would be front and center on this website. anybody?
PS - throw it in my back yard, maybe it will kill the deer - that's where we need population control


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Susan
a resident of Monte Vista High School
on Sep 26, 2009 at 8:25 am

Actually, two humans and three dogs were bitten by rattlesnakes in our neighborhood in the past ten years. We kill rattlesnakes and leave gopher snakes to do their thing.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Nan
a resident of Danville
on Sep 27, 2009 at 9:54 am

I worked for the department of Natural resources for two summers in a "people to the parks program". The naturalist and I gave outdoor workshops for groups enjoying the parks. The most important thing to remember about all snakes, is they are born and live within a 50 yard radius their whole life. So unless the snake is removed and relocated to the other side of the mountain where nobody lives, the snake will find its way back! Let's not be so smug, pets, and kids, are more important to our society than rattlers!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by A snake hobbyist
a resident of another community
on Sep 27, 2009 at 1:05 pm

As a interesting note that is NOT a Western Diamondback rattlesnake, that is a Southern Pacific rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis helleri). The dark color, scale arrangement and banding identify it as such.

A shame it had to be killed, but with a lack of training on wildlife removal, and if the local Animal Control was not willing to come to remove it, he did not seem to have any other options.

Ideally keep on hand phone numbers of organizations that would be willing to remove and relocate wildlife, whether they be venomous or nonvenomous. The life span of any wild animal cornered in a residential area is significantly reduced and can be a threat to other animals. Putting them in more rural areas not only makes it safer for us but helps these creatures continue doing what they were meant to do.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Diane
a resident of Danville
on Sep 27, 2009 at 6:29 pm

Who me: Rattlesnakes in this area are more likely to bite dogs, which is not too uncommon according to my vet.

BTW - You forgot to leave your address for future snake deposits...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bonnie from Danville
a resident of Blackhawk
on Sep 27, 2009 at 7:22 pm

Great job rich! I love rattlesnake meat...


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Eric
a resident of Danville
on Sep 27, 2009 at 8:56 pm

It's a well documented fact that rattlesnakes have a striking distance of twice their body length. Six times two equals twelve foot striking range. It takes one teaspoon of venom to bring down a 180 lb human male. An adult rattlesnake of that size has 4 tablespoons of venom. Do the math. That is VERY dangerous to have in our neighborhood. I don't know about you, but it's scares the crap out of me to think of all the kids this snake could have bitten. Simply removing the snake would not solve the problem. The snake was obviously eating well in the neighborhood.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by A snake hobbyist
a resident of another community
on Sep 28, 2009 at 7:54 am

Rattlesnakes can only strike half their body length, it is a myth that they strike any father, they do not have the muscle mass or body strength to "spring" forward. A 4 foot individual will strike a about 2 feet.

Venom in any rattlesnakes or for that matter any venomous creature varies dramatically not only from species to species but the location and health of the venomous creature. Each species of rattlesnake local to California has a distinctive and unique mixture, somewhat like a finger print. Venom reacts dramatically with each person in different way, your health, how much venom the snakes inject and how you choose to react to the bite can vary (Yes adult rattlesnakes can control the amount they us even in some cases doing a "dry bite" not even using the venom).

Rattlesnakes do wander and roam, currently there is some research being done on how far they really go but most scientists agree they go about 2-8 miles from place of birth. But humans destroy their habitat, drought and lack of food makes any animal wander from their natural territory in such of food and safety. While their striking speed is very fast, their general locomotion is about 3 miles per hour, making them slow and easy targets in a high traffic area. This snake come out of the wild, not comprehending that this new area was a very bad place to be.

Rattlesnakes are food for animals such as Kingsnakes, Coachwhips, Bobcats, Eagles, Pigs and numerous other species. Humans can even eat snakes, the meat is somewhat like fish.

Snakes have a place in nature, they are not evil, mystical, can't jump, fly or out waiting to kill us. They are just one of the many creatures out there that uses venom as the only defense it has to get food and protect itself. More people die from car accidents than snakes bite every year.

A good couple of links on rattlesnakes are these if anyone is interested. Web Link
Web Link


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Marie
a resident of Danville
on Sep 28, 2009 at 9:01 am

A snake hobbyist: Thanks for the interesting facts.

Snake lovers: we are still waiting for some addresses, we are serious about dropping them off, are you going to hold up your end and post your address?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Citizen Paine
a resident of Danville
on Sep 28, 2009 at 9:09 am

Thanks, ASH -- I had a suspicion that Eric-the-Well-Documented Factot-er was not as reliably informed as he claimed, and my googlings confirm your 1/3 to 1/2 body-length strike distance. Three-feet is rather less than Twelve.

I have also heard that juveniles are more dangerous than adults, as they tend to strike with less warning, and unload their entire stock of venom. I didn't bother googling that last assertion, though, so take it for what it "may" be worth.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Lindsay W.
a resident of Walnut Creek
on Sep 28, 2009 at 9:14 am

Marie? Here you go:

1931 1st Ave
Walnut Creek, CA 94597-2540
(925) 935-1978


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sharon
a resident of San Ramon Valley High School
on Sep 28, 2009 at 10:07 am

Citizen Paine, you are right on target Re: juveniles being more potent. I'm on alert whenever I hike - I would much rather run into an adult rattler. No rattler at all is even better...I'm an animal lover (and we have had snakes as pets) but I avoid poisonous varieties if at all possible.

Lindsay W. - can you actually drop snakes off at the Lindsay Wildlife Museum? I thought they had some restrictions around animal drop off. Do you represent the museum? That would be good information to have in general!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Lindsay W.
a resident of Walnut Creek
on Sep 28, 2009 at 11:12 am

Sharon: nah -- no connection to the museum, although that IS their address. I was just trying to give slight pause to The Pompous by entering an address.

Lindsay Museum seems to finesse the rattler issue on their website, which your inquiry chastised me to explore, to make amends.

Prevention tips: "Snakes not wanted in yard."

Since snakes primarily feed on rodents, make your home and yard rodent-free. Alteration of the habitat will be the most successful way to reduce rodents. Keep leaf litter, lumber, trash and rock piles to minimum to reduce hiding places for rodents and snakes. Snakes in this area do not climb nor dig, so installing a tight-fitting fence can keep snakes off your property. The fence should be 3' high and buried into the ground at least a couple of inches.

And, regarding injured/orphanced critters: "Injured or orphaned snakes."

The Bay Area is home to many different species of snakes, including the gopher snake, kingsnake and rattlesnake. The only venomous snake in the Bay Area is the western rattlesnake; all other snakes are harmless. Snakes are beneficial because they eat many animals we consider pests such as mice and rats.
Do not attempt to handle rattlesnakes.

Baby snake: Leave it alone. Snakes can care for themselves from birth.

Snake caught in bird netting: Do not attempt to remove the netting yourself-you will likely injure the snake's skin. If it is not a rattlesnake, cut the netting about a foot from the snake and bring the entire mass to the museum. If it is a rattlesnake caught in netting, call animal control (in Contra Costa County call 925-335-8300).

Injured snake: Place in secure container and bring to the museum as quickly as possible.

Snake caught on sticky trap: Do not attempt to remove the snake from the trap. Bring the snake still stuck to the trap to the museum as quickly as possible.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sharon
a resident of San Ramon Valley High School
on Sep 28, 2009 at 1:07 pm

Thanks for the clarification Lindsay. We have had snakes slither by our yard, but no rattlers so far. I find them while hiking but as this is their territory I expect that. I still keep my eyes on the ground, just in case - so far they just ignore us!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Lindsay Wildlife Museum
a resident of Walnut Creek
on Sep 28, 2009 at 3:21 pm

Lindsay Wildlife Museum cares for injured and orphaned native wildlife. We do not accept healthy animals for relocation.

Our website has good information to help people live with wildlife in their backyards. For snake information, go to Web Link. Lindsay W. did a good job summarizing the information.

Susan Heckly
Wildlife Rehabilitation Director
Lindsay Wildlife Museum


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ron
a resident of Danville
on Sep 28, 2009 at 3:45 pm

Hey Lindsay, looks like your the Pompous. Next time find a real solution. The museum does not want them either, I tried that last year. You have two choices with these snakes, kill them or take them for a ride. Most people are afraid to handle these snakes and a shovel works just fine. Or better yet, you ever throw a snake into a chicken coop?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Dan Conti
a resident of Alamo
on Sep 28, 2009 at 5:38 pm

Lindsay,

While I appreciate the thoughts and effort on how to save these reptiles, and generally agree that whenever possible saving an animal is advantageous over killing it (does that disclaimer make me exempt from the "pompous" category you so generously referred to earlier?). I think a little scope would help you. I am rich's son and lived in that house for 21 years. I could spend hours telling you about close encounters (including the time I was swimming in a pool with one) as well as the numerous dogs that have been killed and our neighbor whom spent a week in the hospital because of one of these. I don't necessarily find joy in killing these animals and we are not out there hunting for them…but it comes down to the simple logic that if you stumble across something that is a threat to you or your family, you do whatever it takes to eliminate that threat, plain and simple. While ideally it would be nice to "make my home and yard rodent-free" or "Keep leaf litter, lumber, trash and rock piles to minimum" but come on...unless I want my yard to be a barren field that's unrealistic. I am going to keep getting rid of any dangerous snakes that threaten me just like I have been doing my entire life, but don't worry, by the looks of this picture they are doing just fine.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned parent
a resident of Danville
on Sep 28, 2009 at 11:08 pm

Dan Conti - your Daddy done raise you right. IMHO any parent who leaves a living rattler in their back yard is asking for a visit from Darwin.

We decided on our snake strategy the day our first born came home from the hospital. King, corn or any other non-poisonous snakes are to be welcomed with open arms, as an ally in the war on rodents and gophers, but if it rattles kill it. Leaving a poisonous snake to slither off leaves it just as free to slither back and, especially if you have kids, that just strikes me as reckless.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bob
a resident of Blackhawk
on Sep 29, 2009 at 4:47 am

Rich did the right thing, those that disagree, have you considered the following:

Many times people stumble on the rattle snake before the snake has time to rattle a warning, it can be in a garden, next to the step off a deck, or at the doorstep of the front porch, you can just walk out and be bit, just like that! What if Rich hadn't been there with his dog? That would have been a sure bite. Same for cats, and children? You get bit, your looking at maybe being flown to the hospital via a medivac not to mention what happens to pets. If rattlers are making a population gain on Mt. Diablo, this action on Rich's part is more than acceptable to protect the community.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by More Info
a resident of Alamo
on Sep 29, 2009 at 4:41 pm

I am a friend of the Conti's.

Rich's toddler grandson Tanner spends every Thursday at their house. The snake was caught directly outside their back door, right next to the area he plays. Anyone who knows about young kids knows that they will head straight for something "interesting".

I can only imagine the disaster that could have occured if the grandson stumbled across the snake the day before (Thursday) the day Rich caught and killed this snake. It could have been very, very bad.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by hjkhjg
a resident of Danville
on Sep 30, 2009 at 8:19 pm

So, you killed an innocent creature for now reason? It did not harm you OR your dog but yet... you kill it?! You had it under control, you could have put it in a container or bucket of some kind and THEN called animal control to come save it, but instead you kill it! When is the last time you or anyone else will see a 6ft rattle snake in their own backyard. I hope karma sure catches up to you someday....KILLER


 +   Like this comment
Posted by hjkhjg
a resident of Danville
on Sep 30, 2009 at 8:22 pm

Also... if your so concerned about snakes coming into your backyard... why dont you move, its their home just as much as yours, if their not bothering you then DONT bother them!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Concerned parent
a resident of Danville
on Sep 30, 2009 at 11:31 pm

hjkhjg's KILLER label is an interesting one.

From it we can maybe deduce that "hjkhjg" is a vegan who allows mosquitoes to feast unmolested, who allows ants, mice and rats to amble wherever they please in the kitchen and who has never owned a pair of leather shoes, (not even Birkenstocks?), never owned a leather purse, briefcase, wallet, watch strap etc.

We can also deduce "hjkhjg" would refuse a ride in a car with leather seats, and never fly Southwest airlines, (all their seats are leather.

And unless hjkhjg is a Native American that whole concept of "home", and who it belongs to can get a bit fuzzy.

Having the head of a large snake pinned to the ground does not constitute control, finding a suitable container on short notice would challenge many people and persuading this large a snake into such a container would be even more of a challenge.

The assumption of innocence, on behalf of the snake, is also interesting since many snake eat their own young, and one this size had likely eaten it's share of cuddly mammals and baby birds.

But there is some hope since "hjkhjg" does admit that being bothered by a snake is an OK reason to bother it back. This nicely gets us off the boring black and white "thou shalt not" to the far more interesting "maybe".

So maybe all us non-vegans can agree that it is OK to kill a snake in your own yard:
a. as long as it is poisonous.
(Let's ignore over-sized pythons, for now, and agree that the non-poisonous snakes around here are at least going to be good for rodent control)
b. as long as you preserve the skin to make something useful.
Debate topic - belts are pretty obviously OK but do wall decorations count?
c. as long as you eat the flesh. (It's OK, you are allowed to cook it first).
Debate topic: does feeding it to your dog or cat, in lieu of their usual meat diet, count?
Debate topic: does using it to fertilize your apple tree or cabbage patch (for subsequent eating) count? Ornamental roses? Hmmm.

Man, this is so much more fun than TV, and, many thanks to Mr. Conti and the Danville Weekly for making it all possible.

Lastly, this site has some interesting info, including the reassuring thought that only 3% of bites are fatal and this lovely description of how much fun you might experience if you get bitten while trying to wrestle a rattler into a box:

"Symptoms of an envenomated bite include: immediate pain, swelling and discoloration, weakness and giddiness, difficulty breathing, nausea and vomiting, hemorrhaging from the wound site, circulatory disturbance such as rapid, fluttery or thready pulse and a drop in blood pressure. Bites on face or neck may result in difficulty in swallowing, numbness of lips and tongue, excessive thirst and cold sweats"

Web Link




 +   Like this comment
Posted by wow...
a resident of Alamo
on Oct 1, 2009 at 10:45 am

hjkhjg, so when you say you hope karma catches up to Mr. Conti, what exactly are you referring to (what could karma do that would be worse than placing a 4 ft rattlesnake in your backyard)? Pretty strong words coming from someone who goes around anonymously calling people killers.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by hjkhjg
a resident of Danville
on Oct 1, 2009 at 4:36 pm

First of all you got the size wrong smarty.. 4 ft is alot different than 6 ft... second of all you live by Mt.. DIABLO... that is were they LIVE so, your bound to see a rattle snake every once in a while. And to mystery concerned parent... did i ask you to get all involved in this? No i didn't.. look at everyone else's comments, other people are just as upset, sorry that i care about animals and think it is EXTREMELY unfair for someone to kill it when it wasn't doing anything wrong. GOODBYEEEEEEE


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Mark
a resident of Danville
on Oct 1, 2009 at 5:11 pm

hjkhjg is a good example of why we must do a better job supporting education in our community, his views not withstanding. The basics, such as grammar, are wanting, vis a vis punctuation, use of "were" when "where" was needed, etc.

I think that it's great to care about animals, even rattlesnakes. However, the folks who live on that property, the Conti's, do so because we as a community allowed it to be zoned as residential property. hjkhjg, I assume that you vote.

We all have the blood of that poor, venomous reptile on our hands. Personally, I think that the Conti's chose an excellent place to live, and although I care about God's creatures, if a potentially dangerous creature was on my property, my concern for my children would override, and I'd get rid of it, even if it meant having that creature become an ex-creature.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Pam
a resident of Walnut Creek
on Oct 2, 2009 at 9:14 am

I think hjkhjg writes like a youngster with passon and compasson. Don't judge strong feelings by spelling and punctuation!!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by wow...
a resident of Alamo
on Oct 2, 2009 at 10:55 am

wait a min...it is a 4 ft snake. Well I guess according to the article it is. Whatever, I wouldn't expect someone as rational as hjkhjg to actually read the article before yelling in the comments.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Geoff Gillette
Danville Weekly reporter
on Oct 2, 2009 at 11:36 am

Geoff Gillette is a registered user.

Folks,
Any confusion regarding the length of the snake is due to an error when I posted the initial story. I thought gauging by the picture of Mr. Conti that it reached well below the bottom of the frame. Mr. Conti corrected me and I corrected the story. Unfortunately, the way our site is designed, that initial paragraph that appears with the story cannot be edited. The snake is 4 ft long, according to Mr. Conti.

Apologies for the error.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Toni
a resident of Blackhawk
on Oct 2, 2009 at 11:41 am

There is always a polarized argument when it comes to creatures of the wild and people...to dispose of or set free. While the health and safety of human residents is foremost, these residents, if not already, need to be consciously aware and mindful of the terrain and environment that they chose to live. Indeed, you are in chaparral country, not NYC. Therefore, teach and remind your family members and neighbors and visitors of the creatures that live in and amongst your neighborhoods in order to live in as much reasonable harmony as possible with each other and to teach and practice respect for the environment and its natural inhabitants. While this rattler was killed, it also means children, teens and adults should not poach or abuse less dangerous animals such as wild turkeys or deer. I lived in the Livermore hills and have had plenty of experience with rattlers, wild boar, wild turkeys, and tarantulas. I wonder how many residents that live near Mt. Diablo actually know the flora and fauna of that area? Education is key to safety and survival when you live near wildlife. And developing a resource of animal habitat organizations, animal control, etc. would be helpful to contact when necessary rather than killing. Does one kill every creature in sight when hiking, camping, or backpacking?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Citizen Paine
a resident of Danville
on Oct 2, 2009 at 3:02 pm

This thread long ago descended into silly season, and I gotta say the most annoying were those who demanded addresses, as if they thought they'd located the Holy Grail of gotcha moments. I dunno about you, or them, but there are lots of folks who post hereabouts whom I don't particularly want to know where I live. We have quite a nest o' vipers on this board.

But I digress.

It did get me to pondering on why we seem to have this innate fear of snakes -- e.g., what if the Contis' "intruder" had been a fox, or a ferret, or a hissin', fussin' feral cat, or a hawk with a wing-down? Would it have evoked the same bloody response? Conversely, what if it had been a 6' crawlin' king snake (no blues reference intended) or a big ol' rat?

I recall long ago/far away reading Carl Sagan's Pulitzer Prize-winning book, The Dragons of Eden. His thesis was that the brain layers as it evolves, and the innate mammalian fear of reptiles is a genetic endowment left over from a titanic battle to rule the food chain. Independent of the reasons, mammals emerged victorious, at least temporarily, in that evolutionary struggle for dominance. The remnants of that struggle live on in our myths and subconscious fears.

Any thoughts on that? Anyone? Bueller?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Davide
a resident of Charlotte Wood Middle School
on Oct 3, 2009 at 10:07 am

needed here


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ghost of Bambi's mom
a resident of Danville
on Oct 5, 2009 at 1:26 pm

Item from sfgate.com: "Woman defends flower garden, kills baby deer

Many people take their gardening extremely seriously, but Dorothy Richardson seems to have taken her passion for flowers a bit too far.

Rchardson, 76, of the Cleveland suburb of Euclid, has been accused of beating a baby deer to death with a shovel after finding it grazing in her flower garden. She pleaded no contest last Thursday to one misdemeanor count of animal abuse and was found guilty by a municipal court judge who sentenced her to 80 hours of community service and ordered her to pay a $500 fine. Richardson said she became frightened when she saw the fawn in her garden and had only meant to shoo it away with the shovel. Apparently she just didn't know her own strength..."

Comment: If the Supreme Court outlaws gun control later this term, can we at least pass some shovel-control statutes?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sue Stockton
a resident of Danville
on Oct 10, 2009 at 6:31 pm

It is disheartening to see how well educated people can be so ignorant about nature. Mr. Conti and Mr. Bob Oxenburgh everything on Earth has value and a purpose and we need to set an example for our kids to respect nature and not destroy it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by JOe BLow
a resident of Diablo
on Oct 14, 2009 at 12:31 pm

who gives a flying fuck


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Bi-coloured python rock snake
a resident of another community
on Oct 14, 2009 at 4:40 pm

Alassss, Poor JOe -- I fear you've BLown it.

And we barely knew ye.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

The valley loses a distinguished and humble leader
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 1,486 views

Not Endorsements
By Roz Rogoff | 7 comments | 1,079 views