Half of Bay Area children have one immigrant parent

A report released yesterday by an immigrant advocacy group examines the contributions of immigrants to California and its regions, including the Bay Area.

The California Immigration Policy Center's "Looking Forward: Immigrant Contributions to the Golden State" examines U.S. Census data to develop a long-term picture of how foreign-born residents adapt and contribute to the state.

"There's always a sense that immigrants are a drain rather than contributing," said Manuel Pastor, director of the Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration at the University of Southern California, who helped produce the report.

California is home to a higher rate of immigrants than any other state in the nation. The survey pools data from the U.S. Census' American Community Survey from 2005 through 2007. The American Community Survey is a 1 percent sample of the population taken each year.

Combining this information produces a larger sample size, and lets researchers examine how immigrants' circumstances change over time, Pastor said this morning during a news conference on the report. Additional conferences are being held today across the state, including in San Francisco and San Jose, to discuss regional specifics from the report.

In the Bay Area, 30 percent of residents in Contra Costa, San Francisco, Alameda and San Mateo counties are immigrants, compared to 27 percent statewide. Roughly one-third of this population is of Latino heritage, but Pastor said that the Bay Area differs from other regions in its higher-than-average Asian population. More than half the region's immigrants are of Asian heritage.

Much like the rest of California, about half of children in the Bay Area have at least one immigrant parent.

"How immigrants do will determine really how the state does and, by extension, how the children do," Pastor said.

Immigrant labor is a major part of the food service, maintenance, cleaning and sewing industries, according to the report.

Three-quarters of cooks in the region are immigrants, as are 58 percent of chefs and head cooks, and 68 percent of dishwashers. Foreign-born workers make up 84 percent of maids and house cleaners, and more than 90 percent of the Bay Area's tailors, dressmakers and sewing machine operators.

About 62 percent of immigrants older than 16 participate in the labor force - the same rate as non-immigrants, according to the report. Immigrants comprise more than one-third of the region's labor force and contribute about 22 percent of the Bay Area's gross domestic product.

Because the numbers are based on census data, there is no distinction between legal and illegal immigrants, Pastor said. The report includes both.

Overall, immigrants tend to participate strongly in the labor force, have younger heads of household, and have higher rates of home ownership, Pastor said.

As federal lawmakers consider immigration reform, "it's important to ensure the debate is informed and based on data," said CIPC director Reshma Shamasunder.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gunslinger
a resident of Danville
on Jan 26, 2010 at 5:09 pm

One might say they "contribute labor." some may say they take jobs and lower wages. LEGAL immigrants contribute a lot to our economy. Illegals are a huge net drain. Your article has been torn apart by Lou Dobbs for five years now. Get a new line you propagandistic hooligans

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gunslinger
a resident of Danville
on Jan 26, 2010 at 5:10 pm

And I have an immigrant parent

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sarah
a resident of Danville
on Jan 29, 2010 at 8:25 pm

Um. Dobbs also gives credence to birthers.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gunslinger
a resident of Danville
on Jan 31, 2010 at 6:30 am

No he didn't. He got mad out of principle that people were intimidating him saying if he even brought it up, even to discredit the birthers, he would be fired. Out of principle he told them not to tell him what he can or can't mention. Sure enough he was fired

while I think the birther movement is inane, and I myself voted for Obama, I do find it peculiar that libs wouldn't even allow the birthers to state their case to be ridiculed. The libs were so afraid of it even being talked about, which is never a good sign. Anywho, I don't know what all happened there, but Dobbs is not a birther and neither am I

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Public Ivy Schools for 2015--Going By the ‘Virginia Rule’
By Elizabeth LaScala | 6 comments | 1,351 views

Me and Ashley, sittin’ in a tweet …
By Tom Cushing | 6 comments | 1,266 views

Exchange Club Meeting on First Amendment
By Roz Rogoff | 0 comments | 506 views