News

San Ramon Valley schools gear up for the future

Creativity, problem solving, communication, collaboration will be key

It would be understandable if the mind went immediately to technology when considering the future of schools in the 21st century, especially given the technology that's come about in the last 25 years or so: Cell phones, personal computers and even fax machines are all relatively recent developments.

That's doubly so in light of the advances that technology has given us. The Internet has replaced the need for encyclopedias. Word processing has replaced handwritten reports. Email and social media have made communication instantaneous. Maps may become obsolete, given GPS navigation, and even books are being threatened by new technologies.

In the San Ramon Valley Unified School District, applying those advances, tracking new developments and putting them to work in the classroom is the job of Technology Director Bruce Chmieleski.

The district is integrating a model being developed by companies across the country to decide what kids will need to know to compete in a global environment, companies that range from Adobe to the Walt Disney Co.

Chmieleski says core subjects -- the ones everyone learns in school, such as English, math, social studies, writing, languages and science -- will remain the top priorities. Those are things he says everyone needs to know, but district schools are learning to weave new themes into them, like global awareness, financial, economic and business literacy. Civic, health and environmental awareness are part of the package.

Beyond that, new horizons are opening up, and it's Chmieleski's job to stay ahead of the curve.

"To move civilization forward and move the culture forward, it requires a broader understanding, that's what the 21st century skills are all about," he said. "The challenge for us is how to teach kids to be critical thinkers."

He said tomorrow's students will have to learn new information, communication and technology skills to navigate in a digital world.

They'll need to learn new ways of learning, too, with increased attention on creativity, problem solving, communication and collaboration.

Chmieleski said schools will also have to adapt, to teach kids that are used to two-second shots on television shows.

"There's challenges to every education system to bring that kind of dynamic world to the kid, to make things attractive and engaging, because if they're not engaged, they're not very motivated," he said.

The district is already using up-to-date technology in its classrooms, with students in some science classes teleconferencing with scientists from Lawrence Livermore National Lab via projection TV. Chmieleski can envision teleconferences with forest rangers talking about the environment without the need for a field trip.

If, say, there's a discussion about World War II, a class may decide to contact an expert. A class may start a dialogue with another classroom anywhere in the world.

"That kind of flexibility is where things should be going," Chmieleski said.

The district has some model rooms dubbed the Classroom 2.0 project where Chmieleski said there's a projection system "to make things big and bring kids into the frame. You've got a good quality sound system."

Chmieleski also wants a one-to-one computing ratio where every student has access to a computer. That, he says, will require changes to school infrastructure, creating enough bandwidth not only for computers but for smart phones and other handheld devices.

Students may have e-books customized for them someday, and there might be what Chmieleski calls a flexible environment, "so that you're not locked in to having these structured desks that don't move around." It could mean desks and chairs on wheels, or lightweight tables that can be quickly moved to form new work groups or stacked out of the way entirely.

"That allows you to do different forms of collaboration very quickly, rather than having all kids in the standard seating structure," he said. "The nature of education is going to be less of this structured one class that's going to be meeting for 18 weeks, with one teacher. You're going to find more personalization and individualization. There's going to be more online learning and self-paced stuff ... I suspect in the future you won't see six-period-a-day high school, where you say, 'Here's your schedule.' You'll see more dynamic scheduling than that."

This new world will require a new breed of teachers, and Chmieleski admits there will be holdouts.

"They'll come along, or they'll eventually retire," he said. But he noted, "I've seen some people who didn't see the value in technology stuff, they like things the standard way, they've dialed in, it's all great -- and then, all of a sudden, there's a piece of something that comes along, and they go, 'Wow.'

"I've seen things that light them up when they're burnt out or tired."

Comments

Posted by Victoria C, a resident of San Ramon
on Oct 3, 2010 at 3:13 pm

This young man knocked on my door today and introduced himself as a candidate for the San Ramon Valley School Board. We're new to the area but he really seemed to have a passion for maintaining the spirit of competitive education in the valley. He's probably going to get both my husbands and my vote. Why is it I see signs with three names on it for the three positions available? Is there some "all for one, one for all" thing I'm missing out on? I've met John Lane for just a few minutes and I can tell he'd be a good director... young and virtuous. Who are the three musketeers or are they the three stooges and do we have to vote for all three if it turns out we only like one?


Posted by Hal, a resident of another community
on Oct 3, 2010 at 4:20 pm

Dear Dolores,

The concept of a slate of three candidates for the SRVUSD Board started in the late 1990's when Joan Buchanan campaigned with two other candidates on a shared-cost basis. It should be understood that all four current candidates are individually running for three positions on the SRVUSD Board. No combined campaign or slate of three candidates changes the voters' right to choose any three of the four candidates on their individual merits.

I will be supporting John Lane and Rachel Hurd with my votes. I have not yet determined my vote for a third candidate. We should all realize that we have four earnest candidates and I suggest voters review the fiscal planning experience and education of all candidates as primary requirement for our best use of SRVUSD funds going forward.

halbailey@yahoo.com


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Preserving Disorder
By Tom Cushing | 68 comments | 1,936 views

Bi-Polar Disorder
By Roz Rogoff | 25 comments | 1,659 views

The drought drives lawmakers to action
By Tim Hunt | 12 comments | 1,370 views

Five Will Get You Fives
By John A. Barry | 0 comments | 90 views