News

BART ID's officer who fatally shot colleague in Dublin search

Det. Michael Maes had 26 years of police experience, including last 14 with BART, chief says

BART Police Chief Kenton Rainey Monday confirmed that Det. Michael Maes, a law enforcement veteran, was the officer who fatally shot Det. Sgt. Tommy Smith in an apparent accident during a probation search in Dublin last Tuesday.

Rainey said Maes has 26 years of experience as an officer, the last 14 with BART and the prior 12 with the Moraga Police Department.

The 42-year-old Smith, a 23-year veteran at BART, was fatally shot while he, Maes and six other officers conducted a search of a robbery suspect's apartment at 6450 Dougherty Road in Dublin at about 2 p.m. last Tuesday.

Maes was placed on paid administrative leave after the shooting, which is being investigated by the Alameda County Sheriff's Office, the Alameda County District Attorney's Office and BART police.

Rainey said Maes has an extensive background in criminal investigations, has received extra training in conducting searches and executing arrest warrants, and has served as a BART field training officer, an acting sergeant and a rifle operator.

The chief said all BART police officers get training on using guns and in searching residences but mishaps can still happen.

Referring to the fatal shooting of Smith, Rainey said, "You can have all the training and experience in the world and something can still go wrong."

He said, "Maes is a very experienced, well-trained officer but obviously something didn't go the way we wanted it to go."

Rainey said BART detectives were involved in conducting 18 probation searches last year but he doesn't know if Smith or Maes participated in those searches.

Rainey said the reason why something went wrong during the probation search last week won't be announced until the sheriff's office completes its investigation, which he said won't be for another three to four weeks. He said BART's investigation won't be finished for another 30 to 45 days.

Smith and Maes were among five plainclothes BART detectives who participated in the search along with two uniformed BART officers and one Dublin officer in uniform, according to Rainey.

He said BART's policy requires that officers who are in uniform to turn on their lapel video cameras during searches but it's optional for officers in street clothes to have and use such cameras.

Rainey said he can't comment on reports that the BART uniformed officers who participated in the search didn't use their video cameras because the matter is still under investigation.

He said if the investigation confirms those reports, "That would be very troubling for me but I would have to see the reason for them (the officers) not using them (the video cameras)."

Rainey also announced a change to the BART Police Department's policies on conducting residential parole searches, search warrants and arrest warrants.

He said that effective immediately, all planned residential searches and deliveries of warrants must have the written approval of the deputy chief for patrol operations or his designee before they are executed.

Previous policy called for a manager to be on scene during a search. That requirement will remain in place in addition to the new requirement, Rainey said.

In addition, Rainey said he is asking the U.S. Department of Justice to provide technical assistance in reviewing BART's policies and procedures and training and the daily performance of its police personnel in all aspects of the use of force and use of force reporting and administering its body camera system.

He said BART also is asking the Department of Justice to review the constitutionality of its search procedures of persons and residences.

— Bay City News Service

Comments

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Julia
a resident of Alamo
on Jan 28, 2014 at 9:50 am

Well it appears all the training in the world will not prevent an accident or a human error mistake.

Someone did something wrong to cause one of the officers to immediately fire his hand gun at another officer, especially when they had the person of interest in jail already.

I still wonder if the plain clothes officers were wearing their chest pocket flip badges that Id's them as a police person. This is a strange and disappointing situation.

Oh yes, and why no cameras????? Or is there a cover-up happening right in front of us. Rules are rules and they must be followed through no matter what...of course unless you are hiding something.

I do not believe this was an accident...I think this was a stupid human over-reacting mistake. There is a difference between an accident and the human error mistake.

Well it really doesn't matter which one it was...it happened and families are hurting on both sides.

Just my opinion, Thanks for listening, Julia Pardini from Alamo


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Answering questions from my last blog on the cemetery
By Roz Rogoff | 83 comments | 1,898 views

Bandwidth and the spinning wheel: Net neutrality
By Gina Channell-Allen | 4 comments | 904 views

A fitting tribute to Ken Mercer
By Tim Hunt | 1 comment | 621 views