News

EBMUD board asks for voluntary 10% water reduction

'We hope that these water savings can help us avoid more stringent measures later,' board president says

With drought concerns persisting, Danville residents and businesses were asked by their water provider Tuesday to voluntarily reduce their water usage by 10% until further notice.

"We are grateful to our customers who use water wisely every day. But we must ask for a 10% voluntary cutback to make sure we have enough water stored in case this water shortage persists," said Andy Katz, president of the East Bay Municipal Utility District Board of Directors.

The board made the call for voluntary conservation during its regular meeting Tuesday in Oakland. EBMUD supplies water to roughly 1.3 million Bay Area residents, including those in the town of Danville and unincorporated Blackhawk and Diablo.

The agency relies on snowmelt and runoff for a vast majority of its water supply, and its main water source -- the Mokelumne River watershed located 90 miles from the East Bay -- is at 49% of normal, EBMUD officials said.

With dry conditions projected to continue, EBMUD is also looking into obtaining additional water from other sources, including the Freeport Regional Water Facility through a contract with the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and a possible water transfer with the Placer County Water Agency.

In the meantime, customer conservation is vital to maintaining the local supply going forward, according to Katz.

"We hope that these water savings can help us avoid more stringent measures later," he added. "And if mandatory rationing becomes necessary, we guarantee that customer allocations would not be based on use during this voluntary cutback period."

For the latest water supply update, information on rebates and conservation tips, visit the EBMUD website.

Comments

Posted by frankly, a resident of Danville
on Feb 12, 2014 at 6:29 am

We have foreseen this drought for many years. We have long ago taken out all lawns; installed drought resisted plants, water with drip;
all of this reduced our water consumption drastically as well as reduced water bill.

Do we get penalized for taking these actions many years ago and not able to reduce anymore??????




Posted by Watson, a resident of Danville
on Feb 14, 2014 at 8:07 am

When they start enforcing the illegals that hang out st Home Depot--and use OUR water--then we can have a conversation. About whAt I should do to "conserve." And if 12-30 million illegals are legitimized---then there wasn't a resource issue in The first place.


Posted by Why?, a resident of Danville
on Feb 14, 2014 at 3:06 pm

Last time we conserved, we got rewarded with a fee increase. We conserved too well.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Tough new rules on water are necessary
By Tim Hunt | 11 comments | 1,132 views

Circumstances without Pomp
By Roz Rogoff | 3 comments | 987 views

‘Much Ado’ or is it Adios for ObamaCare?
By Tom Cushing | 5 comments | 333 views

trAction Painting Summer Camp
By John A. Barry | 0 comments | 26 views