DanvilleSanRamon.com

Living - March 9, 2007

Presenting the Past: Rancho Romero and its legal woes

by Beverly Lane

Rancho Romero is a familiar name in the San Ramon Valley. In Alamo, the Jones ranch was called Rancho Romero and an elementary school bears that name. But who knows the origin of the name? And why is Rancho Romero's name nowhere to be found on lists of Mexican ranchos in Contra Costa County? The tale is a sad one.

In 1843, brothers Jose and Inocencio Romero applied to the Mexican government for a grant for what they said was a leftover, or "sobrante," piece between the ranchos of Joaquin Moraga, William Welsh, and Rancho San Ramon Valley (Pacheco/Castro). It covered today's Tice Valley and much of Alamo, about 20,000 acres.

At that time Lorenzo Pacheco and Mariano Castro lived in San Jose and told the town's alcalde there that they were happy to have the Romeros as neighbors. The Contra Costa Gazette of Aug. 27, 1864, stated: "It was mutually agreed that the Romeros should occupy the land north of a certain creek, which ran across the (Pachedo/Castro) ranch."

In 1844 the San Jose alcalde and Gov. Manuel Micheltorena reviewed the grant application which included a sketch map, or "diseno." The governor stated, "Let the Judge of the proper district take measurement of the unoccupied land that is claimed."

The Romeros could not afford to have the measurement made since their wealth was tied up in their stock and there were few surveyors available. As was the case with many other Mexican ranchos, neighbors accepted the rancho's approximate boundaries. After all, there was plenty of land and the cattle grazed unrestricted by fences. Cattle ownership was established by regular roundups where calves were marked with their mother's brand.

But other than the measurement, the Romeros did what rancho owners were required to do. They moved to Tice Valley, built adobes, constructed a corral, cultivated vegetable and grain crops, and ran cattle.

We next find the Romeros appearing before the alcalde in January of 1847, ready to sell one-half of their rancho to Francisco and Jose Miguel Garcia, their brothers-in-law. The sale was to be subject to the final result "if the Government grant it in ownership." Both parties agreed that, if the grant were not finally made, "then Garcia should lose equally with Romero."

Mexicans and post-Gold Rush settlers assumed that the Romero brothers owned the land and had legally sold the Alamo area to the Garcias. Jose Garcia's daughter Maria married a Capt. Merrithew in one of the marriages which made landowners of many young Americans.

According to Virgie Jones in "Historical Persons and Places in San Ramon Valley": "Garcia gave the couple a stretch of land that Maria could cover on horseback in one day from sun-up to sundown." Jones also states in "Remembering Alamo" that John M. Jones and three other men bought land from Francisco Garcia in 1851.

When the Romero brothers petitioned for confirmation of their claim to the "Romero Sobrante" before the U.S. Board of Land Commissioners in 1853, they produced papers to establish their claim which did not include the title documents. Many witnesses testified to their ownership. The Romeros stated that the title papers had been used in an 1850 suit and had been taken to Georgia by a lawyer, Fred H. Sanford, never to be seen again.

The Romero claim for five leagues of land was rejected by the board and appealed to the U.S. District Court where it also lost. In 1857 the judge wrote that their case was a hard one, "for there seems no reason to suppose that the grant would have been refused, if the measurement had been made . But no grant, either perfect or inchoate, was made, nor any promise given that one should be made."

Imagine the effect of this tangled web of land ownership in the San Ramon Valley. The Romeros (and therefore the Garcias) were not the owners of the northern part of the Valley. Americans who had bought land from Romero or Garcia lost their claims. Attorney Horace Carpentier managed to get the Alamo land as well as the southern part of the Pacheco/Castro rancho. As Hubert Bancroft wrote in his "History of California": "this Carpentier seems to have been a shrewd land fiend interested in many of the crooked cases."

A sad tale, indeed.

Sources: Northern District Land Cases 304 and 322; Bancroft, "History of California," Vol. VI, p. 557; "The San Ramon Rancho," Contra Costa Gazette, Aug. 27, 1864; Virgie V. Jones, "Remembering Alamo," p. 60 and "Historical Persons and Places in San Ramon Valley," p. 116

Beverly Lane, a longtime Danville resident, is curator of the Museum of the San Ramon Valley and co-author of "San Ramon Valley: Alamo, Danville, and San Ramon."

Comments

There are no comments yet for this post

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Choose a category: *

Since this is the first comment on this story a new topic will also be started in Town Square! Please choose a category that best describes this story.

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields