Corner sidewalks being dug up at Hartz/Prospect intersection--for what?
Original post made by psmacintosh, Danville, on Sep 24, 2010
Local retailers wanted a Stop Sign to make pedestrians safer.
But Town didn't want the backup of vehicles that a Stop Sign might forceably create.
I (for one) suggested a Signal which would only trip when there was the presence of side traffic vehicles or a pedestrians. This would solve the Town's above objection.
Now I've heard that the Town is installing "bulb-outs". Can anyone confirm? When/where/who decided on this?
Last I heard, the "City Planners" were only going to paint longer red curb zones while analyzing the situation further. (Can you say terrible lack of NOTICE by the Town to us citizens, once again! And lack of real opportunity for input.)
IMO, "bulb-outs" are a terrible concept--they put pedestrians more "suddenly" directly in front of cars AND they make it harder for cars to access the parking spots (causing more street congestion and more backing up--which is more dangerous for all).
I like to see if there is any real "scientific" evidence that these bulb-outs are safer and better (than regular corners and than a signal). Otherwise, we're just throwing more taxpayer money down the drain here--and not even fixing the real underlying problems--safety for pedestrians AND safe, easy, reasonable access of vehicles from Prospect.
What do YOU think--not that it makes any difference NOW!
The House of Representatives performs history’s first repeat hara-kiri
By Tom Cushing | 11 comments | 1,322 views
Net Neutrality a win or loss for open Internet and First Amendment?
By Gina Channell-Allen | 2 comments | 617 views