Town Square

Post a New Topic

Alameda County candidate accused of actually living in Danville

Original post made on May 7, 2014

Alameda County auditor-controller candidate Kathleen Knox pleaded not guilty Tuesday to six felony counts for allegedly lying in campaign papers about where she lives.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, May 6, 2014, 4:30 PM

Comments (8)

Posted by Tour Uncle Sam, a resident of Danville
on May 7, 2014 at 7:17 am

Now, THIS is the kind of election fraud enforcement I can support -- because, you know, it actually exists.


Posted by Louise, a resident of Danville
on May 7, 2014 at 8:13 am

I guess cause she has made up her own rules she expects everyone to accept her position. This is the pervasive mentality of those in public office. They make rules to suit themselves and the rest of us have to accept it. I'm not shocked by this behavior it started with Clinton when he redefined sex. Everything is up to interpretation now and certainly when you have lawyers in political office.


Posted by C. R. Mudgeon, a resident of Danville
on May 7, 2014 at 11:15 am

Knox's fraudulent voting illustrates how easy it is to do, if you have multiple actual residences, or just keep voting in the county where you used to live (as well as voting where you now live). Due to lack of coordination of voter registrations between counties (and even more so between states), it's quite easy to do.

Knox only got caught (on the illegal voting) because of her candidacy for office. And probably that only came to light because an opponent got wind of her actual residence.

The integrity of our election and voting process should be a non-partisan issue - but various vested interests prefer the status quo.


Posted by PSMacintosh, a resident of Danville
on May 7, 2014 at 2:28 pm

As to the "residency" requirement issue only:
The objective of the "residency" requirement is so that, when a politician votes in a certain way then that politician themself will share in the benefits or detriments of that decision. So that they have "skin in the game" and have, relatively, the same interests as the other "residents" of the area.
Noting, of course, that "Resident Interests" can vary between residents (different people have different opinions about things, such as basketball hoops on the street, etc.) and there are huge differences between the two resident groups of owners or tenants.

Let's see, it looks like Knox owns a property in the area, owns and operates a business in the area, has been a resident in the area in past years, and apparently could live in the upper apartment. So it's not like she doesn't have any ties or direct interest in the area at all. Quite different than someone who has no direct ties to the area whatsoever.
(Seems like she could have played the political game better by establishing her residency with clearer actions.)

Wonder what her positions were on her apparent claims that "business as usual" in that area was NOT GOOD.

It would certainly be very interesting to hear WHO it was actually behind this investigation (complain, initiated, prompted it) to discover whether there was any "dirty, back room dealing" going on (in addition to Knox's wrong-doings). It seems a very convenient outcome for her opponent (who I know nothing, about except that he is an established career politician).


Posted by John, a resident of Danville
on May 7, 2014 at 5:31 pm

The voter ID reform currently being pushed is BS. It is a complete waste of money and time. If people really want to make voting more equitable they should pray for the supreme court to reverse its latest "give-away" to the wealthy.

These PACs are going to control all future elections. Only the wealthy will have real freedom of speech and voters rights. Again we are seeing how activist judges are reshaping American democracy.


Posted by Highlander, a resident of Danville
on May 9, 2014 at 7:01 am

Someone ought to investigate one of the Richmond City Councilmembers who is doing the same thing. Somehow, his children magically attend Miramonte High School in Orinda while he serves in Richmond.


Posted by Highlander, a resident of Danville
on May 9, 2014 at 7:01 am

Someone ought to investigate one of the Richmond City Councilmembers who is doing the same thing. Somehow, his children magically attend Miramonte High School in Orinda while he serves in Richmond.


Posted by mw, a resident of Danville
on May 12, 2014 at 5:17 am

Great. How many Bay Area candidates running for office pull these stunts? I feel sorry for the residents of Alameda County having a candidate on their ballot that have to deal with someone who is dishonest. Thank goodness this person didn't run for CoCo auditor.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Understanding Early Decision in College Admissions
By Elizabeth LaScala | 1 comment | 1,796 views

New heights for NIMBYs
By Tim Hunt | 26 comments | 1,121 views

When those covering the news become the news
By Gina Channell-Allen | 0 comments | 885 views

Earthquake Insurance
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 712 views

Merger of Music and Painting
By John A. Barry | 0 comments | 93 views