Town Square

Post a New Topic

I-680 auxiliary lanes to start opening this week

Original post made on Jun 24, 2014

The new Interstate 680 auxiliary lanes between Danville and San Ramon are set to open beginning this week, officials said Monday.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, June 23, 2014, 4:59 PM

Comments (5)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Judie V.
a resident of Danville
on Jun 24, 2014 at 8:10 am

This is such good news! Finally an end to the dust and noise created by this construction. And the improvement in the freeway will be wonderful!


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Julia
a resident of Alamo
on Jun 24, 2014 at 8:20 am

Wake up folks...this was a very,very big waste of taxpayer money.

Think about it and most of all think about the real benefit...THERE WAS NONE

Thanks for listening, Julia Pardini from Alamo


 +   Like this comment
Posted by FanDanville
a resident of Danville
on Jun 24, 2014 at 8:35 am

As part of the cost, don't forget how many deaths and injuries occurred in this construction area during this period?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by FanDanville
a resident of Danville
on Jun 24, 2014 at 9:06 am

What we, in Danville, really need is a separated auxiliary lane going north on 680 that connects Sycamore to El Cerro.

But, of course, CalTrans never gives notice or requires real, effective surveying of the desires and needs of ordinary citizens in an effected area. It just caters to the agenda and concepts of its own liberally-schooled Planners, to ABAG, to special interest groups, and to the goals of long-distance commuters.

IMO, everyone should have equal access to the roadways.
Car pool lanes (HOA lanes) are rubbish science. They just foster longer distance commuting.
Meter lights are rubbish science. They also just foster longer distance commuting at the expense of shorter distance travelers.
Toll roads are exclusivity projects, solely borne out of the need to find additional financing sources.

IMO, all public roads should be free to use.
First come, first served. No preferential treatment to any group.

If the traffic is too much (and if Government can't/won't provide more roads), then individuals will find another way on their own and without Government intervention and force. Private industry will see the need and address it.
There is no real need to subsidize certain concepts, such as car pooling, at the expense of all other individuals. Each concept stand on its own feet. It is either a good idea for folks to do on their own (and without a special freeway system for them) or it isn't that good of an idea.

Is a particular hybrid car a viable idea on its own...or not? If so, it doesn't need to be given an HOA pass.

We have been forced into transportation concepts that liberal-minded Urban Planners believe in (without any vote or say on our part) and have been taught in school. The ultimate goal is to force us out of cars and into mass transportation systems. The idea is to convert freeways into part of their mass transportation concepts.

The idea that a person can decide how and when they want to travel is a bad idea to the Planners. Individualism--to get in your own vehicle, go where you want, when you want, and how you choose to go--is antithetical to the beliefs and schemes of the Planners. They know best for you!

I've seen California change from "freeways" to toll lanes in my lifetime.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by John
a resident of Danville
on Jun 24, 2014 at 3:57 pm

FanDanville:


Get a life everything's a big liberal conspiracy. You guys are pathetic. Why not continue your investigation of Obama's birth certificate. To quote you the modern conservative movement is "Rubbish".


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Vote YES on Measures 45, 46, & 47, NO on 48
By Roz Rogoff | 30 comments | 2,084 views

Prop 47: not perfect, just preferable.
By Tom Cushing | 2 comments | 755 views

The Vranesh situation heads to court
By Tim Hunt | 6 comments | 596 views