Town Square

Post a New Topic

Caltrans answers questions about Interstate 680 construction

Original post made on Mar 24, 2011

Several Caltrans officials were on hand at an open house on Wednesday night to answer the public's questions on the I-680 pavement rehabilitation and southbound HOV lane extension project, which began in January. More information about the 680 rehabilitation project is available on the [Web Link Department of Transportation website].


Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, March 23, 2011, 8:11 PM

Comments (5)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by dbrower
a resident of Alamo
on Mar 24, 2011 at 11:47 am

And this morning, there were guys out fixing some of the torn orange fence. I don't know that I would have sent them out in the rain myself, but I guess they were already clocked in to do something.

Another question I asked was "why the orange fence at all?", and the answer was basically to protect the hillsides. From what seems mostly to be from careless contractor movement of equipment etc. It's cheap disposable fence so when it gets broken it's no great loss.

The last question I asked was why take out the new(ish) center divide that was only put in when the current HOV lane was added not that long ago. The answer is that the repaving is going to raise the road surface enough that the height of those barrier sections would be sub-standard, so new barrier to the new required height is needed.

-dB


 +   Like this comment
Posted by psmacintosh
a resident of Danville
on Mar 25, 2011 at 12:27 am

Is this design system going to end up being better off or worse off for those local Danville drivers who utilize the freeway to makes jumps between Sycamore to Diablo Rd....or Sycamore to El Cerro....(or vice versa)?
Won't the metering lights slow down and stop our ease of movement?
Is there a special access lane running between Sycamore to El Cerro....or what?

If it ends up being a slower design than what we have right now, then it will be a dismal failure for Danville.....and cause more in-town traffic, slow downs, and danger. More in-town congestion doing those hops to SRVHS, etc..
Is anyone from the Town really looking out to protect us here!?! We need faster local traffic flows in Danville, not slower.

I couldn't make it to the meeting to find out. Frankly, I suspect the worse.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by dbrower
a resident of Alamo
on Mar 25, 2011 at 7:38 am

There's a project webpage that may answer some of those questions, in the article at Web Link

There's also a hotline at 510 286 5820 where they promise to answer questions. Call, ask, and post a followup with answers to the things that concern you.

However, my understanding was no significant changes to the flow, except for the HOW extension from Livorna to Rudgear. This is principally pavement repair.

-dB


 +   Like this comment
Posted by psmacintosh
a resident of Danville
on Mar 25, 2011 at 11:57 am

With the HOV (Carpool) Lane being extended through Danville, we have LOST another freeway lane for LOCAL use. This will make the other non-HOV lanes more congested......and will make it slower to utilize the freeway for LOCAL hops across town. This is NOT GOOD for Danville!

The CalTrans site doesn't specifically mention whether there will be Metering Lights installed, but someone, in an earlier message, mentioned that there would be. CalTrans is going to be working on the entrances.
For Danville, these metering lights will be nothing but an unfortunate hassle and slow-down for us all.....and might even backup our city streets around the entrances (if done poorly).

Has Danville Planning studied what CalTrans will be doing?

Yes, the freeway potholes needed to be fixed, but now they have escalated the bringing in the HOV lane and entrance changes to us.
I doubt it will be good!

I may sound pessimistic.........but I've experienced these freeway changes happen throughout CA and seen the end results.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by dbrower
a resident of Alamo
on Mar 28, 2011 at 7:45 am

psmacintosh, the HOV lanes have run through Danville for more than ten years! There's no change there.

It's being extended from Livorna to Rudgear, which last time I checked, isn't exactly Danville.

I've seen no mention of metering lights from Caltrans. When I lived through their introduction on the other end of my commute, they improved the flow on the local streets, and aren't turned on most of the time. If they are added here, it's not something to worry about.

-dB





Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Measure BB could pay to connect Dublin Boulevard to Livermore
By Tim Hunt | 5 comments | 1,005 views

Moving to Maine, Maybe
By Roz Rogoff | 3 comments | 925 views

“…and all I ask of dyin’, is to go naturally” *
By Tom Cushing | 11 comments | 606 views

Wheels for Meals on Wheels
By John A. Barry | 0 comments | 184 views