Town Square

Post a New Topic

Of Petraeus and Portia

Original post made by Tom Cushing, Danville, on Nov 12, 2012

This story contains 986 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by cardinal
a resident of Diablo
on Nov 13, 2012 at 6:57 am

And now, General Allen -- has he been building His character, too? With all the slap-and-tickle being played by the brass and their buddies, it's a wonder anyone has time to fight the war.

What I want to know is: who'll be the first to say that this is all Obama's fault?

Like this comment
Posted by spcwt
a resident of Danville
on Nov 13, 2012 at 11:43 am

Congratulations on your engagement, Tom.

As you know, I enjoy being an internet troll. So since you brought up General Petraeus’s adultery, I thought I might ask you a personal question on this topic.

You believe in Jesus, the Bible, and whatnot, right?

Remember when Jesus said that if you marry a divorced woman, you’re committing adultery? It’s in Matthew 5:32:

But I say unto you, that whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery: and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced committeth adultery.

You don’t actually believe that, do you?

General Petraeus may be facing criminal charges that stem from circumstances around his adultery. Fortunately for the broader public, the government no longer tries to criminalize our private sexual behavior.

But imagine if they did. You wouldn’t like that, would you?

Yet, segueing into the other topic in your column, aren’t you and your liberal friends shoving your version of morality down our throats with respect to Obamacare?

Your version of morality forces a rich person like me to pay for middle class healthcare. You call it a moral issue.

But Obamacare is not a clear moral choice, because due to its mammoth cost, it will prevent us from keeping our promises we already made to pay for Medicare and Medicaid for the poor, elderly, and disabled.

These programs will be insolvent in about 10 years. Web Link Medicare costs alone are expected to rise from 3.5% of GDP today, to well over 6% of GDP in less than 20 years. Web Link

Everyone agrees that we cannot possibly tax our way out of this fiscal crisis. We will have to make cuts. And after we’ve raised taxes to ruinous levels and slashed our military budget to the bone (which we should) we will still be left with the hard choice of cutting Medicare and Medicaid. There is no way around that.

There is nothing moral about breaking our promises to the poor, elderly, and disabled so that Obamacare can give $200 billion a year of healthcare tax credits to the middle class.

Yes, Obamacare is paid for through tax increases. But as you know, we can’t rob Peter to pay Paul. Every tax dollar that goes to Obamacare is a dollar that can’t be used to stabilize Medicare and Medicaid.

It’s not unlike Gen. Petraeus’s affair. He promised to love and care for his wife. He can’t possibly care for both his wife and his mistress.

We can’t possibly pay for both Medicare and Medicaid and also pay for Obamacare benefits for the middle class. So who deserves it more? The poor, elderly, and disabled? Or the middle class?

Sometimes there’s no clear moral choice.

Like this comment
Posted by Tom Cushing
a resident of Alamo
on Nov 13, 2012 at 12:40 pm


I'm not comfortable sharing that much personal information with an anonymous internet troll. As a UU, though, you could say that I do believe in a fair amount of 'whatnot.' That spiritual stuff is better the subject of a long conversation, over beers.

Suffice it to say, though, that enough is already known about me that, if I was a Tampa socialite, I might consider bringing in the authorities.

I will be busy for the next few days, and not able to give you the detailed fight you want over the ACA, again. I Can say that straw dilemmas are rarely sturdy. More later.

Like this comment
Posted by American
a resident of Danville
on Nov 13, 2012 at 5:27 pm

I am a long time Danville resident, and really love living in this great town, which is a truly fantastic, all-american, wonderful place to raise a family. I have found that over the years the majority of danville residents are kind, caring, wholesome, hard working people, who through hard work, dedication, and a moral compass, have created a town that others should emulate. Very few of us are divorced, we attend church services regularly, and have traditional christian values.We look out for our neighbors, volunteer in our schools and youth sport teams, and live within our means. Through hard work, we have created small businesses, and are doing financially better than our parents.It is not surprising that the Contra Costa Times recently noted that Danville has more registered Republicans than any city or town in the Eastbay, South Bay, or Bay area.

When I first starting reading the Danville Express, it was a great source of local, non-partisian, news stories and local events. However, the Danville Express has now become nothing but a liberal periodical,paying columnist like Tom Cushing, to write weekly hit pieces on the Republican party. I, like many Republicans, have often written in, to offer a different opinion, to these constant left wing columns. However, it has dawned on me that every time I, or my fellow Republicans, write in, in response to Mr.Cushing's liberal rants and raves, it helps the Danville Express sell ads, as they can claim a higher readership, with more potential customers reading the Danville Express.

Thus, to quote President Nixon, you will not have "American" to kick around anymore, or to use to sell ads, for this left wing periodical. This is my goodbye. I will never again read the Danville Express or write in, and I encourage my fellow Republicans to do the same. I would also encourage any advertisers who are Republicans to stop spending your hard earned money on the Danville Express, and save your money for all the increased taxes Obama plans to hit us up with in the next four years. Nobody frequents a restaurant, hair salon, or picks a realtor because they run an ad in this Danville Express anyway. You are financially supporting a left wing periodical. Save that money, and perhaps donate to Dr.Condi Rice's campaign for President in 2016.

And, Mr. Cushing, I did not want to sign off before finding one thing, anything, that I could agree with you on. It was just announced tha the A's Bob Melvin won AL Manager of the Year, which I believe we both would agree, he earned. Miracles can happen, maybe there is hope that Obama will stop with the class warfare, and stop treating those who have played by the rules and earned income as the enemy.

God bless Danville.

Like this comment
Posted by Tom Cushing
a resident of Alamo
on Nov 15, 2012 at 8:07 pm

So, Am, you're self-deporting? Still, I have a few Qs.

The thing I haven't ever understood about your approach is that you have acted like my very presence on this outlet as an OpEd-type columnist somehow shouldn't be allowed. Do you not trust your fellow citizens to make up their own minds -- do they need your protection from these, ahem, "rants and raves?" The Founding Fathers didn't think so -- why do you? Hell, even the SF Chron, for all its consistent politics, has a conservative columnist, Ms. Debra Saunders.

Your relentless attacks on my credentials, such as they are, also seem to have been made with intent to "kill the messenger." Why not focus on the message? Isn't there enough there with which you disagree? For any future reference, the spelling is "adjunct."

Isn't Mr. Petraeus a Democrat? This column is mostly about him, and there are ample numbers of Dems in my "found-out philanderers" club. This wasn't much of a GOP hit piece. That said, this election overall bore out the accuracy of the statement by Messrs. Ornstein and Mann in an earlier blog:

"The GOP has become an insurgent outlier in American politics. It is ideologically extreme; scornful of compromise; unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence and science; and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition.”

Just look around this Board -- the evidence of all those things abounds. I do not think that your views are under-represented.

Finally, I'm pretty sure we might also agree that our Billy deserved the MLB Executive of the Year award he won last week.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

ValleyCare closes Livermore thrift store
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 1,222 views

The Art of Protest Placards
By John A. Barry | 0 comments | 48 views