Town Square

Post a New Topic

A lesson on the law of unintended consequences

Original post made by Ann N. Imous on Oct 26, 2008

An elderly widowed gentleman has been given the bad news from his doctor - he has less than six months to live. He's worked hard all his life and has amassed a fairly decent sum of money. He has a married daughter and wants to leave all his money to her and her husband but he knows that the inheritance tax will be hundreds of thousands of dollars.

So what can he do to reduce the confiscatory inheritance tax?

If he lives in a state that recognizes same sex marriages, here's what he can do:


1. He tells his daughter and son-in-law to get a divorce, they do - legal.

2. He then marries his former son-in-law - legal.

3. When he dies, his "spouse/former son-in-law" inherits his money tax-free (note that there is no inheritance tax between spouses) - Legal

4. The former son-in-law now re-marries his former wife and the result is that they have inherited a fairly decent sum of money TAX FREE! -legal

Vote no on Proposition 8 and put the shaft to the inheritance tax!

Comments (2)

Posted by Moron with an I, a resident of another community
on Oct 28, 2008 at 9:33 am

Isn't it amazing that all these people who say they just want to protect tradition and are not bigots are oddly silent on the Federal version of DOMA? DOMA was one of the most hateful pieces of legislation passed. If there were no Federal DOMA then there probably wouldn't be any marriage fight at the State level. DOMA prevents gay people who are registered domestic partners from having any of the same Federal legal protections given to married people. So, all you Prop 8 supporters, when are you going to fight to repeal DOMA so that Cali's domestic partners are treated fairly under the law? I'll bet none of you do because your real intent is to discriminate. That, folks, is a bigot. Like the word or not, most Prop 8 supporters are BIGOTS!


Posted by Moron with an i, a resident of another community
on Oct 28, 2008 at 9:39 am

I should have added that the suggestion given in this topic won't work because of DOMA. Even if gay people are married in Cali, you still pay the Federal inheritance tax because of the 1996 Federal DOMA law. So, Prop 8 bigots, how do you reconcile that you are only protecting "marriage" but are fine with domestic partnerships and then allow your Federal gov't to extend rights to heterosexuals which are specifically denied to gay couples? With any luck the Democrats will take over everything and then repeal the Federal DOMA laws. At that point, hets can keep marriage because domestic partnerships will get equal treatment under Federal law.


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

The Gay Rights Movement Coming of Age
By Tom Cushing | 35 comments | 1,382 views

A Norman Rockwell Town
By Roz Rogoff | 6 comments | 1,144 views

Anti-fracking folks rail against railroads
By Tim Hunt | 14 comments | 562 views

Be an Exhibitionist!
By John A. Barry | 5 comments | 181 views