Town Square

Post a New Topic

Vets Hall committee nears decision point

Original post made on Apr 9, 2009

The Veteran's Building committee met Monday to go over a new design requested from architects ARG to put all veterans' activities on the second floor.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, April 7, 2009, 5:49 PM

Comments (2)

Posted by Community courtesy, a resident of Danville
on Apr 9, 2009 at 4:23 pm

Dolores, did we ever get opinions on the following:

How much Old Town is too much??

Around Town, posted by Community courtesy, a resident of the Danville neighborhood, on Apr 4, 2009 at 8:22 am

Dear Dolores,

This note on "old town Danville" was received as part of an agenda for Danville neighborhood discussion groups meeting Saturday, April 4, 2009. The reference is Mr. Bob Myhre's LTTE in your Friday edition provided below:

For our agenda: How much Old Town is too much?

Today, we will discuss Old Town north of Diablo Road and its need for significant renovation, rejuvenation and replacement. We would also like to discuss the Vets Hall as out of place among the rejuvenation of Prospect.

In general, most neighbors agree that Danville has too much old town that has not been renovated into attractive shopping and hospitality and has failed to create anchor store locations for larger retail operations. The Vets Hall is an eye-sore without any character appropriate to the continuing renovations and rejuvenation of old town Danville.

**Commentary by Jane, Danville neighborhoods discussion groups, Alamo region community of neighborhoods**

REFERENCE:

Tear down the Vets Hall

Dear Editor:

Once again I feel compelled to offer a rebuttal to your story about the "New Option for Vets Hall" as published in last week's issue of the Danville Weekly.

I totally disagree about there being a concurrence of opinion or acceptance of the version saving the front of the building. Obviously some of the people felt it had "historical value," but the "historical value" of the veterans buildings in both Lafayette and Walnut Creek DID NOT prevent them from being torn down - and it should not either here in Danville!

If upwards of $7 million or $8 million is going to be spent on the upgrading of the building, it should be done in a manner that will give it the utmost in utility and not need enlarging or replacing for use by succeeding generations in the coming decades - after all, it was built in 1925 and has outlived its current usefulness.

**LTTE by Robert D. Myhre, WWII and Korean veteran**

Hal, as a community courtesy


Posted by tester, a resident of Diablo Vista Middle School
on May 28, 2010 at 4:50 pm

This is just a test on an old posting.

<b>Is this bold face?</b>

<em> is this italice? </em>


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

A Norman Rockwell Town
By Roz Rogoff | 7 comments | 1,319 views

David Brooks at his Best and Worst
By Tom Cushing | 9 comments | 865 views

Anti-fracking folks rail against railroads
By Tim Hunt | 24 comments | 765 views

Be an Exhibitionist!
By John A. Barry | 5 comments | 269 views