Town Square

Post a New Topic

VOTE NO ON MEASURE C

Original post made by Informed Voter on Apr 15, 2009

I am voting "No" on Measure C. Our District is sitting on 6.9 million dolars for times of "economic uncertainty," plus it is sitting on another 5.6 million dollars in "unencumbered reserves," and it has another 1 million dollars to aid with school needed purchases (replacement desks, etc.).

The Measure C campaign wants you to believe that class-size reduction would "go away." Why the scare tactics? Are you voters putting two and two together when reading one of the ballot arguments, which supposes that a "yes" vote will help retain qualified teachers? The last time we had a parcel tax vote, the teachers received a series of permanent raises. While I believe that no parcel tax funds will be used for teacher's salaries, I know that class size reduction has, in years past, been paid for out of the general fund. If we don't pay class-size reduction from the general fund, then it frees up money in the general fund to pay for teacher's raises. It's moving money from one pot to the next (strategies they have used before) so they aren't "technically" breaking their promises. This type of behavior/strategy is exactly what makes the voters mistrust the District. Also, in years past, almost all pink slips issued were rescinded prior to the start of the new school year and very few jobs were lost.

Vote NO on Measure C. Have the courage to find out just how resourceful our District can be when it HAS TO BE.

Comments (1)

Posted by Community courtesy, a resident of another community
on Apr 15, 2009 at 5:16 pm

Dear Dolores,

With the excellent work Geoff Gillette had done in fact-checking claims by TDW Forum authors, would you please ask Geoff to validate Informed Voter's reserves references and any requirement for such reserve balances mandated for a State school district such as SRVUSD.

In neighbors' research of on-line budgets posted to the SRVUSD website, such reserves were actually future capital expenditures already budgeted for educational and facilities purposes. As voters, neighbors needed to know if unused reserves exist for the operations of schools and their programs and none were actually found that did not have a immediate purpose in 2009/2010.

Let's respect Informed Voter's information and provide SRVUSD budget study references so all voters can have perspective of sources and uses of funds.

Hal, as a community courtesy


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Moneyball, the Sequel: Billy Beane for President!
By Tom Cushing | 6 comments | 1,009 views

Spedowfski Announces run for Livermore City Council
By Roz Rogoff | 1 comment | 894 views

Planning the "Pleasanton way"
By Tim Hunt | 11 comments | 873 views

Take Full Advantage of Free Standardized Testing Opportunities
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 365 views