Town Square

Post a New Topic

Alamo MAC hears from schools chief

Original post made on Mar 3, 2010

The School District will soon decide on whether to install solar panels at Monte Vista High and other schools, and Superintendent Steve Enoch told the Alamo MAC that he would like to see it done. The plan is to erect carports at the student parking lot with solar panels on top.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, March 2, 2010, 9:21 PM

Comments (10)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gunslinger
a resident of Danville
on Mar 3, 2010 at 7:07 am

This is off topic but I need this question answered. Is it true that a kid brought a gun to SRVHS and was not expelled?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ralph N. Shirlet
a resident of another community
on Mar 3, 2010 at 8:00 am

Dear Dolores,

We all appreciate humor. A national movement has been started to open-carry glass bottles in the shape of "six-shooters" filled with gum balls. By law these open-carry enthusiasts have to carry their "ammo" as gum balls in their pockets. The glass bottle gun is available at Cost Plus and fits typical holsters used by open-carry gunslingers. It has become a sticky situation..(smile)

..and now we return to the regular portion of our program:

The issues not addressed by Steve Enoch or through MAC member questions last night are:

#1 - What specific efforts are being made to retain teachers as the primary priority of education versus the real estate business of schools. What is the ratio of teacher-to-administrator lay-offs?

#2 - What expertise for Solar PV power generation is available within the district's facilities organization? Who are the Solar PV experts advising the district's board? What efforts have been made to combine the Solar PV bonds with other government and industry incentives to lower costs further? Has the primary option of placement of panels on existing structures been reviewed and budgeted for cost savings in installation and operations?

One HAL of a guestion, one after another, right?

The ROFL in Ralph N. Shirlet


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gunslinger
a resident of Danville
on Mar 3, 2010 at 11:09 am

Really, so are you saying this was a conservative kid making a statement with a gumball gun? Well then no problema. You see, that's what the media is for. To clear things up. I'm sure someone can understand why I was shocked to hear only that a kid brought a gun to school. He didn't bring a gun. He brought a gumball machine. I didn't know about this specific open carry movement. Interesting


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Gunslinger
a resident of Danville
on Mar 3, 2010 at 11:12 am

Back to business. It's a ruse to focus on administrative costs when they are a minute fraction of teachers salaries. I think going with green energy is an intelligent investment, both monetarily and in terms of pollution. Just know adminstrators that most of the community would be so happy if you took on the teachers unions, we'd be happy to see you get bonuses


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Ron
a resident of Alamo
on Mar 3, 2010 at 11:39 pm

Disgusting to see the school district even consider solar - and even more disgusting to see people blithely ignore the idiocy of such an "investment". Just where is the money coming from? The Tooth Fairy? No, it is tax money from a vastly indebted State. This inane "thinking" by bureaucrats is the exact reason California is a basket case.

As for the so-called teachers, fire every fifth one right now. About time the rest of the slugs, er, teachers, start earning their paychecks.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Jerry Hubbard
a resident of Danville
on Mar 4, 2010 at 4:27 am

I like mac, especially mac & cheese. Does the school's chef have any recipes to share?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by L.C.
a resident of Danville
on Mar 4, 2010 at 8:45 am

The low interest Qualified School Construction Bonds that the district may use for solar are part of a federal stimulus package. Money saved from the district's energy bills will be used to pay back the bonds. Projections show that no money will come out of the district's general fund to pay for the bonds, and that because right now construction costs are low and there are generous PG&E rebates available, the project may generate significant revenue for the district's general fund. It is exactly the kind of forward thinking that is necessary in these times of budgetary crisis. Irvine USD just approved a solar project that projects $17 million in savings over the next 20 years.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Barth
a resident of another community
on Mar 4, 2010 at 1:32 pm

Jerry Hubbard...it's been a long time! Our friend Happy (you know, "Happy Kyne and the Mirthmakers", uses the following recipe at his Taco and Run restaurant:

www.foodnetwork.com/recipes/...macaroni-and-cheese-recipe/index.html

I can't vouch for it personally, but Happy seems to be happy with it.


 +   Like this comment
Posted by F. Olivas
a resident of Monte Vista High School
on Mar 4, 2010 at 1:49 pm



Hopefully, when one looks at the costs of installing solar panels, one will use prudent insight to find ALL THE HIDDEN costs which will be there when the "Use it or Lose it" approach is done.
For example, will the Use it or Lose it provide long term funding for technical maintenance? Does the district have the expertise to maintain the installation of solar panels or will the there be added costs to hire outsiders? Was a complete and thorough cost analysis done including costs which will surface many years down the road? Will these hidden costs only surface down the road which will be moved over to the general fund impounding the overall money for instructional purposes? How much money needs to be set aside for replacement of panels as they begin to deteriorate?
Certainly by now all these costs are by have been evaluated and reported some where for all to read.
Have they?


 +   Like this comment
Posted by Alamoan
a resident of Alamo
on Mar 5, 2010 at 5:40 pm

I'm with you F. Olivas. The school board always seems to gloss over or ignore the hidden costs. A perfect example was the replacement of low-tech overhead projectors with LCD projectors. The board buys them, gives them to schools and never considers the cost of replacement bulbs which run around $300 apiece and must come out of the schools budget. Since the projectors were all purchased at the same time, many of the bulbs burn out around the same time, leaving the schools with a big, unplanned expense.


Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.

Email:


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Vote YES on Measures 45, 46, & 47, NO on 48
By Roz Rogoff | 30 comments | 2,148 views

Prop 47: not perfect, just preferable.
By Tom Cushing | 2 comments | 854 views

The Vranesh situation heads to court
By Tim Hunt | 7 comments | 668 views