Town Square

Post a New Topic

Alamo fundraiser nets $59,000

Original post made on Feb 8, 2008

Alamo Community Foundation's first fundraiser netted approximately $59,000 to pay for Alamo incorporation feasibility studies required by the state. Two hundred people attended the silent auction and dinner in late January, including Assemblyman Guy Houston (R., 15th) and County Supervisor Mary N. Piepho.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, February 8, 2008, 12:00 AM

Comments (11)

Posted by Oxymo Ron, a resident of another community
on Feb 8, 2008 at 8:05 am

Dear Dolores,

Nice editing of the AIM release. Once all the campaign hype was removed from the release there was little or no news to report.

The story is the same handful of people from various Alamo committees, clubs, groups, associations and councils, as less than 300 out of more than 16,000 Alamo region residents (within the AIM boundaries), raised $59,000 as part of the $200,000 required by Contra Costa LAFCo for the incorporation application process.

The story not told is what regional political sponsorship will provide the remainder of the funding and at what political costs to the Alamo region residents? Some 6000 voters within the AIM boundaries have withdrawn from any and all interest in the incorporation process and will vote YES or NO in any election based on the results of the LAFCo application process and incorporation proposal presented at time of election.

If anybody is interested in the complete campaign release, read Alamo Today front page for February, www.alamotoday.com.

OX

One HAL of a Pal


Posted by Good job!, a resident of Alamo
on Feb 8, 2008 at 3:07 pm

Well great job to the Foundation. They were able to raise a huge sum of money. Who cares that there's only 300 people wanting to make a change. When making any change, those that set out with enough man power-- will preceed in the direction that they want to go; that's enough to say for those that don't do anything at all. Whether you believe in incorporation or not, you should give congrats to those that have raised that much money at a fundraiser, don't you think?


Posted by Oxymo Ron, a resident of another community
on Feb 8, 2008 at 4:37 pm

Dear Good Job,

I personally congratulated a committee member and added congratulation to a message on the Alamoinc website. The issues addressed in previous commentary had to do with news coverage and nothing really to do with incorporation.

OX

One HAL of a Pal





Posted by Alamo Ron, a resident of Alamo
on Feb 8, 2008 at 10:37 pm

OX asks, "...what regional political sponsorship will provide the remainder of the funding and at what political costs to the Alamo region residents?"

By this statement OX seems to imply that the local Alamo well of funding has dried up completely and the proponents will now have to sell their soles (and a couple of heels) to some regional moneyed and mythical "political sponsorship."

I would inform the learned gentleman that the people of Alamo know a good thing when they see it and will fully fund, and support, and vote in favor of this very worthwhile effort.

And by the way, please don't call us the "Alamo Region." We are a community and will be a town.


Posted by Oxymo Ron, a resident of another community
on Feb 9, 2008 at 4:47 pm

Excellent response, Ron,

At present, circulating in documentation among neighborhoods, there is confirmation of AIM funding commitments from regional sponsors. We should hope the earnest interest is to create an independent council that serves an Alamo Community and possibly neighborhoods.

Alamo neighbors, as a majority, could easily provide $200,000 to the Alamo Community Foundation but governments including LAFCo have demanded that neighbors, and their neighborhoods, end their privacy and confidentiality. At issue is the Alamo Community, as the committees, councils, groups, associations and clubs officers, participants and supporters, is less than 1400 residents that likely cannot raise $200,000 amongst themselves.

The good people of Alamo, defined by AIM boundaries, see a government-specified independent council that will operate under county general plan, zoning, re-zoning, building codes, and approval processes and that is no difference in voice for neighbors and their neighborhoods. No further interest in incorporation is warranted.

And, Ron, to avoid conflict in terms, our region from Saranap/Rudgear to Diablo Road is now the Diablo Vista Region and the majority of neighbors realize they live in "another community."

Happy Valentines Day, and thank you for your commentary,

OX

One HAL of a Pal


Posted by Hal Bailey, a resident of another community
on Feb 10, 2008 at 7:40 am

Posted for All things Alamo & Pop(u)lar

Dear neighbors,

Local news is newsworthy when it interests the total readership of a newspaper. Such interests are served by People and Events stories that present an important event and the positions on issues of the people attending the event.

In this exchange, we illustrated that an event among a very small minority in a region and the emotions of the issues involved does not make a newsworthy story to the majority of readership. When issues are reduced to fact and emotions are erased, what was intended to be a story ends up a listing suitable to "Club News."

Thank you for your commentary to halbailey@yahoo.com,

Hal


Posted by Alamo Ron, a resident of Alamo
on Feb 10, 2008 at 8:04 pm

OX says the following which is NOT SO:

"The good people of Alamo, defined by AIM boundaries, see a government-specified independent council that will operate under county general plan, zoning, re-zoning, building codes, and approval processes and that is no difference in voice for neighbors and their neighborhoods."

What twaddle. Once Alamo becomes an incorporated town, the good citizens will have a Local Voice and a Local Choice. Obviously, this local power will make things very different and very much better. And we will be independent of the County. This is what happens when communities incorporate - they become self-governed. Duh...

And by the way, I'm not sure what a "government-specified independent council" is. It does sound vaguely like the "autonomous town council" pap which was promulgated by this same source several weeks ago and which was remarkable only for its absurdity. Do we really have to travel down that well-worn and rutted rugged road again?

Sheesh...







Posted by Oxymo Ron, a resident of another community
on Feb 11, 2008 at 7:55 am

An Alamoron, Ron, thank you,

The subject was news coverage and your oxymoron is to cancel that consideration for a discussion of the Contra Costa LAFCo incorporation application process including election of an independent town council that will operate under Contra Costa County General Plan, county zoning and re-zoning, county building codes and land use approval processes. Once elected, California Municipal Law does not require such a town (city) council to use citizen input in the consideration of council decisions or actions. The Town Council can operate fully independent from the residents interests, needs and advisory and only be removed from office after four years or by an earlier recall election.

My point is that such knowledge is clearly stated in the Municipal Law Handbook www.cacities.org and is illustrated in various resources at www.calafco.org. That is definitely not news and certainly is not of any interest to a majority of The Danville Weekly readers or the majority of neighbors within the Diablo Vista (Alamo) Region.

It just is not news, but it is an laughable oxymoron when such costs of an additional layer of government provide no change for the Diablo Vista neighborhoods.

Damn funny, what?

OX

One HAL of a Pal


Posted by Alamo Ron, a resident of Alamo
on Feb 12, 2008 at 10:45 pm

OX is harping on the same old, same old topics which have already been disposed of in this forum and in other places.

Once established, the Town of Alamo will NOT operate under the Contra Costa County General Plan.

We will NOT be under county zoning and re-zoning.

We will NOT be under county building codes and land use approval processes.

This is why we are incorporating - duh...

And yet again, show me an incorporated town or city in California that DOES NOT have significant citizen input to town council decisions or actions.

OX states,

"Once elected, California Municipal Law does not require such a town (city) council to use citizen input in the consideration of council decisions or actions."

This is NOT SO! The BROWN ACT specifically mandates that:

"Every agenda for regular meetings shall provide an
opportunity for members of the public to directly address
the legislative body on any item of interest to the public,
before or during the legislative body's consideration of the
item" (Section 54954.3.)

Have a care, OX, you're going to get a sore on your tongue...




Posted by Oxymo Ron, a resident of another community
on Feb 13, 2008 at 12:03 pm

Dear neighbors,

You have all needed input for your review of whether or not media provides the depth of information in stories about community or the lack of it. You have all the references for your research and validation of such stories concerning community formation. You have all the campaign releases and responses to test against provided reference information.

You have read many releases and opinions expressed in response to forum postings and media stories. Carefully, you may examine each comment against reference information and determine your own positions and opinions. Any neighbor's goal should be to provoke consideration by neighbors of the issues that impact neighborhoods and community. Together, we have completed that consideration and confirmed that the canards of a campaign can quickly be discounted in reference review.

It is a beautiful day in the neighborhoods,

OX

One HAL of a Pal

Posted from halbailey@yahoo.com


Posted by Emily Chrisman, a resident of another community
on Feb 13, 2008 at 3:41 pm

Posted at the request of the author

Dear neighbors,

With so little interest in incorporation currently among the Diablo Vista (Alamo) Region neighbors, why does the subject get so much attention in this forum's discussion of news coverage. By overall culture we are not a community or does any formation options serve us better or worse within our neighborhoods. Why must we discuss formation options when a majority has researched and dismissed any creation of a community or community government.

I would like to see the editor provide some clearcut editorial guidelines for story development so we can better understand what information to share and what quotable resources to provide for more in-depth news reporting by the great reporters that serve us.

Let's focus on news,

Emily
Tice Valley neighbor

Posted from halbailey@yahoo.com


If you were a member and logged in you could track comments from this story.

Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Understanding Early Decision in College Admissions
By Elizabeth LaScala | 1 comment | 1,111 views

Sentinels of Freedom Newsletter
By Roz Rogoff | 0 comments | 917 views

When those covering the news become the news
By Gina Channell-Allen | 2 comments | 731 views

New heights for NIMBYs
By Tim Hunt | 12 comments | 720 views