Town Square

Post a New Topic

Click It or Ticket campaign heats up for summer

Original post made on May 16, 2012

Police will be enforcing seat belt usage by drivers and passengers, but will also be issuing citations for those who do not have children under the age of 8 properly buckled into an appropriate child safety seat.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, May 15, 2012, 6:56 PM

Comments (11)

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Tired
a resident of San Ramon
on May 16, 2012 at 7:02 am

I get belts save lives. However, it should be my choice if I want to wear a seat belt or not. ...I hate the fact that Big Brother is always watching...

 +   Like this comment
Posted by bz
a resident of Danville
on May 16, 2012 at 8:17 am

Here we go again! Seems to me we need more reasons to get $ into the coffers. I totally agree with "Tired!"
That said, be sure your seat belt is fastened the "correct" way. I was pulled over and ticketed because my seat belt was under my arm. A bit ridiculous!

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sam
a resident of Danville
on May 16, 2012 at 1:36 pm

Tired -

If your choice didn't affect me, I might agree. But, if I have to pay for the EMTs to scrape your brains off the road after you've been thrown from the car in an accident, then it does affect my wallet.

Bottom line: driving is a privilege, not a right -- so, it comes with certain conditions. Wearing a seat belt is one. Stopping at red lights is another (no matter how much you might want it to be your "choice").

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Catherine
a resident of Danville
on May 16, 2012 at 1:46 pm

Sam, it really is all about the money for the coffers as seat belts can kill as well. One of my dear sorority sisters was killed from internal injuries caused by wearing her seat belt.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Derek
a resident of Danville
on May 16, 2012 at 3:05 pm

As with motorcycle helmets, Sam has a certain point regarding the uninsured and the expense of fire departments & other emergency responders.
In this case though I still tend to agree with "Tired" for the simple reason that the police will save FAR more lives (and write far more tickets and make far more money) by agressivley ticketing those on cell phones.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Tired
a resident of San Ramon
on May 16, 2012 at 6:35 pm

Sam, the taxes that I pay are often spent on things that I don't feel I should pay for either....

Catherine, sorry for your loss. I have to agree that depending on the situation, seat belts can save or kill you.

I wish that the police would spend their time on the people on their cell phones or driving while texting....

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sam
a resident of Danville
on May 17, 2012 at 10:37 am

No reason that police can't enforce both, and go after the idiots going 60mph on Camino Tassajara and Sycamore Valley Road.

Seat belts save lives, pure and simple. Sorry to hear about the sorority sister who died. But, the statistics show that that is the very rare case. the evidence is overwhelming that seat bealts save FAR more lives that are ever lost because someone was wearing one. Not even a close call.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Aubrey
a resident of Alamo
on May 18, 2012 at 3:52 pm

It's amazing how big the nanny state has become and personal responsibility has faltered.

While seat belts, helmets, and cell phones ARE NOT stupid, the state laws governing their use definitely ARE stupid. Another case of tax dollars at rest.

I pay taxes and health/auto insurance premiums. If I choose NOT to wear a seat belt sometimes, my monetary contributions more than cover the cost if I'm injured during those times, no one else is monetarily affected...

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Citizen Paine
a resident of Danville
on May 19, 2012 at 9:45 am


1 -- does your objection extend to legal requirements that seatbelts be included in all cars sold? Costs money, after all. What about red lights and stop signs -- aren't they an expensive incursion on your liberties?

2 -- would it surprise you to know that NHTSA studies, verified by many others, demonstrate that between fully 40-50% of occupant fatalities are avoided by seatbelt use? There Is another study that reduces that number by less than half, because it corrects for the fact that the idiots who fail to wear seatbelts are Much more likely to be crappy drivers who get in catastrophic accidents from which there are no survivors, regardless.

With all due respect to the statistically unlucky, dont you have to play the odds in these matters? Seatbelts put the odds dramatically in your favor. Frankly, it's remarkable to me that this is a matter of debate -- I blame our education system, I guess.

 +   Like this comment
Posted by bz
a resident of Danville
on May 19, 2012 at 12:08 pm

Amusing...Just after I wrote my comment about not really "appreciating" our police focusing on the WAY a person elects to wear a seat belt, I passed a patrol car driving in front of an elementary school. Interestingly, the officer was holding a phone to his ear! Guess the logic doesn't "go both ways!"
Doesn't make a lot of sense to me.....

 +   Like this comment
Posted by Sam
a resident of Danville
on May 22, 2012 at 1:47 pm

Sorry, Aubrey, you are wrong. Your insurance premiums do not cover the cost of EMT services coming to the scene of the accident to treat you or carry your body (or its parts) away.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Baker bill targets BART strikes
By Tim Hunt | 2 comments | 1,358 views

The House of Representatives performs history’s first repeat hara-kiri
By Tom Cushing | 11 comments | 1,290 views

Old Memories and iMemories
By Roz Rogoff | 2 comments | 682 views

Net Neutrality a win or loss for open Internet and First Amendment?
By Gina Channell-Allen | 2 comments | 601 views