Town Square

A catharsis in Alamo leadership??

Original post made by Community courtesy, another community, on Apr 14, 2009

Dear Dolores,

This story contains 170 words.

If you are a paid subscriber, check to make sure you have logged in. Otherwise our system cannot recognize you as having full free access to our site.

If you are a paid print subscriber and haven't yet set up an online account, click here to get your online account activated.


Like this comment
Posted by Carol
a resident of Alamo
on Apr 14, 2009 at 10:50 am

I'm sorry but catharsis of leadership doesn't make sense. No one was purged, it was political not spiritual and I disagree that the AIM peopl were not leading the community. Just because people voted against being a town doesn't mean they were voting against AIM. There were people who just didn't want to be a town. Here is the def of catharsis. I don't see any way that it fits with what you are talking about.

Main Entry:
ca·thar·sis Listen to the pronunciation of catharsis
Inflected Form(s):
plural ca·thar·ses Listen to the pronunciation of catharses \-ˌsēz\
New Latin, from Greek katharsis, from kathairein to cleanse, purge, from katharos
circa 1775

1: purgation
2 a: purification or purgation of the emotions (as pity and fear) primarily through art b: a purification or purgation that brings about spiritual renewal or release from tension
3: elimination of a complex by bringing it to consciousness and affording it expression

Like this comment
Posted by Louise Buriss
a resident of Alamo
on Apr 17, 2009 at 10:38 am

I beg to differ with you.

I voted against "the town" AND against Vicki Koc (founder of AIM) and her misfits on AIM.

I hear on the links that she has been traveling since her defeat, no wonder things are more caqlm and pleasant in Alamo these days - Vicki is in Mexico.

Like this comment
Posted by carol
a resident of Alamo
on Apr 17, 2009 at 11:18 am

And I beg to differ right back with you. Just because you have a personal axe to grind, evident in your posts, you don't represent anyone other than yourself. I strongly doubt that incorporation was defeated because everyone voted against AIM.

Since you like to use such mean spirited language, those same 'misfits' you voted against are the ones who put their time, energy and money into representing Alamo and protecting all the things that people like you claim they want Alamo to be. I don't see you volunteering for anything other than anonymous online bashing.

Like this comment
Posted by Community courtesy
a resident of another community
on Apr 20, 2009 at 7:05 am

Dear Dolores,

This string of commentary is defamatory and violates your Terms of Use.

AIM lost the election because they failed to reach out to the thousands of voters in our neighborhoods and provide the definition of the government and its budgets. AIM committee members were strangers to the majority of voters thus there could be nothing personal between AIM and the majority of voters in neighborhoods.

Hal, as a community courtesy

Like this comment
Posted by Hal Bailey
a resident of another community
on Apr 21, 2009 at 1:48 pm

Dear Dolores,

Many incorporation proponents are assuming that a growing catharsis of leadership in the Alamo region is an anti-AIM activity and a political battle. Many neighborhood reps are reporting just the opposite. The diversity of positions from the March 3 elections are being brought by proponents, opponents and neighbors to discussion groups that are defining community going forward.

It is the growth of diversity in such participation by many neighbors that is creating a catharsis of leadership and new diverse culture for our region. Alamo region neighbors just didn't shrink back into their neighborhoods and leave Alamo once again to the community groups.

Good things can happen when community occurs!!