Letters to the editor
Original post made on Dec 28, 2007
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, December 28, 2007, 12:00 AM
on Dec 28, 2007 at 9:22 am
Let's be fair!
The commentary by many, including Phil Erickson, illustrates the primary issue of AIM's incorporation proposal as establishment of an autonomous government led by a city (town) counsel that has no defined obligation to citizens' participation or advisory. The AIM incorporation proposal simply provides another layer of government in Alamo that is dependent on the services, and costs of services, from Contra Costa County.
Clearly, costs in the county are going up, including pensions, and those costs will be covered by increased service fees whether Alamo is a city or remains a unincorporated community. In analysis for CCC-BOS, county administrator reports county services to cities will be the most costly because they are unique and specified separately from levels of service to the broader county communities and neighborhoods. If the City (town) of Alamo attempts to replace those services with their own contractors and administration, the costs of such small contracts and increased administration will add similar or greater service cost increases to Alamo residents' monthly bills.
Most important to Alamo residents, once incorporated and an autonomous city council is elected, we will have no defined voice in our government for four years. The first city (town) council can establish the structure and operations of the city, the services provided, and their costs to residents without any vote or other resident input.
There are many reasons to support incorporation of the City of Alamo as a defined government structure of citizens' commissions and committees. There is little reason to support incorporation that does not provide that result.
Posted as a courtesy of CDSI Research Fellowship
on Dec 31, 2007 at 9:07 am
I thought we went through all this in another area of the Town Forums.
What in blazes is an "autonomous city counsel?" The writer seems to think the counsel will be elected for life. Show me another city in California that elects its government for life terms.
The writer also seems to think that the new town government will not appoint citizens advisory committees and commissions. Again, show me another city in California that does not appoint its citizens to a myriad of different advisory groups and commissions.
Does the writer really think that the good folks of Alamo will stand by and watch this happen?
Let's face it, organizing and running a town is pretty complex and a lot of work. Alamo will need everyone's help.
on Dec 31, 2007 at 2:32 pm
Welcome back, Alamo Ron,
As you re-read the CDSI comments, you will note that term is four years, but the possibilities of autonomous structuring of the city of Alamo for regional special interests might warrant a life sentence. As you appropriately note, the good folks are not standing by and settling for an autonomous government and that is evident in the level of comments and concerns currently voiced by Alamo neighbors.
The real issue covered in response was the cost of contract services to a city versus a county region. What are your thoughts on that subject, Ron?
Smile Ron, we celebrate the thoughts you provoke with your good humor.
Happy new year,