Danville approves retail stimulus plan
Original post made on Mar 6, 2009
Read the full story here Web Link posted Friday, March 6, 2009, 12:00 AM
on Mar 6, 2009 at 11:15 pm
Wow! Not only is Socialism alive and well in Danville with the City Council doling out our tax dollars but the Danville Weekly has:
1. Decided to totally revise this article after comments by readers,
2. Totally deleted the comments on the original article by readrs.
Socialism sponsored by the Danville City Council and ...
Censorship by the Danville Weekly as engineered by Danville Weekly's Mr Geoff Gillette.
We suggest you put back up the original article instead of trying to defend the actions of the council as you did when you appended your own defense of such an ill-conceived act by this council.
Journalism in Danville? Not yet.
on Mar 17, 2009 at 7:47 am
I sure hope that katy is misinformed but I don't think she is.
I agree that DVW should put up all its original content and the posts. That is censorship.
I would at least love to hear their side of the story. Maybe they could post it in this forum.
on Mar 17, 2009 at 9:58 am
Geoff Gillette is a registered user.
I would like to take a moment and respond to Katy's comments.
1. The article was not "totally revised". In between the time that the article was originally posted and when we went to press, changes were made in editing the story for our print edition. Further quotes were added, some language was changed to make the story read better. As a result of reader comments, we also attempted to make it more clear that the funds in question were not general fund monies, but instead came from the Community Development Agency, which is a separate entity. The funds must be used for downtown improvements and can't be used to pay down debt, etc.
2. On Friday, we post our entire print content, both in pdf form and each story as it appears in the print edition. The original story (and all the attendant comments) were not in fact deleted. The story remains online at Web Link, but the headline position it held was lost. The current architecture of our website does not allow for the new and old stories to be merged or linked. If we re-do an online story, it will come into play with an 'updated' tag on it. Regardless, in this case neither the story nor the comments were deleted.
3. No one's comments have been removed, changed or otherwise altered. There were two threads that emerged from this story due to the posting of the print version. Regardless, the changes to the updated story were not censorship but clarification and did not alter the facts that were presented or present them in a different light.
4. The Danville Weekly has taken no editorial position on the stimulus package. The story presented was a recounting of what happened at the meeting where the stimulus package was announced. If Katy had appeared at the meeting and expressed these concerns to the council, we certainly would have reported it.
5. The Town Council meets this evening and has a section called "For the Good of the Town" if anyone wishes to attend and express their concerns about this stimulus package. If you intend to do that you should get there at the beginning of the meeting as that is one of the first items on the agenda.
You can also write a letter to the editor, attend one of the monthly Mayor's mornings (next is 7:30 a.m. April 10 at Chow's), contact your council members or contact me directly. 837-8300 ext 234
6. We only remove comments from the Town Square forum when they are offensive, libelous or in some way violate our Terms of Service.