Compositional Amenities, Fear-mongering, Fox and the Future | Raucous Caucus | Tom Cushing | |

Local Blogs

Raucous Caucus

By Tom Cushing

E-mail Tom Cushing

About this blog: The Raucous Caucus shares the southpaw perspectives of this Boomer on the state of the nation, the world, and, sometimes, other stuff. I enjoy crafting it to keep current, and occasionally to rant on some issue I care about deeply...  (More)

View all posts from Tom Cushing

Compositional Amenities, Fear-mongering, Fox and the Future

Uploaded: Sep 8, 2015

Are the so-called culture wars overblown ? trumped-up by media moguls and others who substitute ratings and attention for substance and meaning? I think they are.

That conclusion may seem at odds with recent events like the recalcitrant Kentucky county clerk who provoked a media storm by steadfastly refusing to keep faith with her oath of office. Her subsequent jailing (now rescinded) for contempt-of-court fed the irrational persecution complexes of other evangelicals -- in this overwhelmingly Christian country. Fortunately, we are also a land that has deeply committed itself to the separation of church and state.

Lost in the Kentucky festivities and the assumed implication that there's a serious movement afoot is the salient fact that there are 3,143 counties in this country -- many of which are in states that did not recognize same-sex marriage until the Supremes ruled in June. A few have been slow to comply, but only in Rowan County has there been a direct nose-thumbing at the legitimate rights thus finally established. That's a timely compliance rate of some 99.9%, and ought to be recognized and celebrated as a symbol of Americans' respect for the rule of law.

But why is there any outcry, at all? Here's where the wonderfully academic concept of "compositional amenities" kicks-in. I first saw it in a column last week, but it apparently was coined as part of a series of papers describing resistance to various policies. It is defined as "the comfort of a common cultural identity and minimized cultural conflict." Put another way, it's the sense of ease that comes of knowing your surroundings, and that they are homogenized and unchanging.

Certainly, there is value in shared customs and traditions. They provide a sense of continuity that is celebrated primarily by those who have grown-up in and benefitted from certainty and sameness ? think of Tevye's rant in Fiddler on the Roof (Tradition!). Younger citizens generally may be more inclined to reject such certainty for the excitement and creativity of growth and novelty. Compositional amenities are why we humans celebrate sameness, in both its positive (inter-generational ties) and negative aspects (bias against 'others' who are unfamiliar to us).

A 2009 study of immigration and trade policy found that there was greater resistance to the former than the latter ? even where the likely impacts in terms of jobs and wages were identical. The economists then examined that resistance to seek its source: they found that more of the concern related to compositional amenities than to conventional economic impacts (wages, taxes, spending). They also found that the former were much more highly concentrated among less well-educated subjects.

And that, in turn, brings us to the issue emphases among the campaigns for the GOP nomination in 2016. The first debate contained overwhelming preoccupation with fear issues: immigration, terror, defense, ISIS and perceived loss of religious liberty. Largely or wholly absent were conversations about humankind's dire, defining challenge of global warming, race relations or income inequality, or issues of primary concern to younger voters ? like, say, crushing student loan debt. As such, the candidates were playing to their base ? the compositional amenities crowd -- and ignoring issues of far greater substance on the merits or to the polity as a whole.

Further, if you want to understand candidate Trump's success to-date* on the trail, it is clear that he has consciously tapped-into that deep vein of fear among a limited subset of voters ? older Americans who see the inevitable changing of the guard away from their familiar circumstances, less-well-educated citizens who may perceive themselves as having limited capacity to change and adapt, and even the neo-Nazis who have perpetually opposed The Unfamiliar denominated as groups afflicted with "otherness."

In a sense, Mr. Trump has taken a page from the vaunted Fox News playbook. That network has raised fear-mongering to a high art, with story-after-story about some/any new or unfamiliar phenomenon, partaken-of by unfamiliar faces and hues -- and why each is wrong, scorn-worthy and ultimately unAmerican. Their best demographic? Seniors.

The real questions here are 1 ? is this compositional amenities concern anything new, and 2 --will it carry the day in the next elections and beyond? I think both answers are 'no.'

We tend to forget that there has been vehement resistance to 'otherness' throughout US history, as each new immigrant group sought to slam the door behind it. Despite the hopeful poetic invocation on the Statue of Liberty, each unfamiliar wave of newcomers has had to shoulder its way into the American mainstream.

Whether it's The Irish, The Italians, The Poles, or religious minorities like Catholics and Jews in Protestant America, each was initially excluded, and suspected of threatening the status quo. Eventually, each was generally able to add its own flavors into the American stew. But there were rear-guard actions against every one of them, from entrenched insiders ? to the point that "religion " and "national origin" were written-in to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect their legitimate interests in unbiased treatment.

In an important way, those groups had it easier than groups who were more observably 'other' ? e.g., Japanese Americans interned during World War 2, and Chinese subjected to exclusion acts passed in Washington and in our fair California during an earlier era. And currently, folks who are observably different in complexion or dress or custom probably absorb the most enmity.

It may also be true that current newcomers do not so much seek to disappear or assimilate into the mainstream, as to stake their claim to the American Promise on their own terms of language or custom. Media's 24-hour scrutiny may also lead to coverage of fringey events, and ascription of them to whole groups of people who look similar. That said, I think the current disquiet is more of an American theme than an aberration. I expect it to recede, and sometimes to rear its ugly head when an issue gets demagogued.

As to the second question above, sooner or later demographics are destiny, and this country's population trends are inevitable. The GOP can enjoy temporary reprieves based on the absence of campaign finance rules, and of voter restriction shenanigans, but change IS gonna come.

Americans are also a generally fair-minded, forward-looking and courageous bunch. Over time, we were self-selected for those traits. Eventually, I believe they will over-balance our fears, despite the best efforts of those who would stoke them for their own purposes. Courage and optimism have always prevailed ? may it ever be so around here.

* Mr. Trump has been quoted as saying "? if there's a rhyme and a reason, people can figure you out -- once they can figure you out, you're in big trouble." As such, I believe he has written his campaign's eventual epitaph. His haranguing, substance-free style of personal attacks on anyone who discomfits him will wear thin the more he's exposed and the better he's known; he'll have to ride that one-trick pony into oblivion.
Local Journalism.
What is it worth to you?


Posted by anony, a resident of Beratlis Place,
on Sep 8, 2015 at 4:30 pm


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Sep 8, 2015 at 8:03 pm

Trump's days are numbered...he will not be elected. I look forward to the day when the next President is sworn into office and Trump returns to firing his TV wannabe starlets.

That poor sticky hairy potbelly creature from Kentucky is temporarily free. I suspect that she'll soon return to her jailhouse perch.

Racism, global warming, undesirable differences...that will remain until our planet spins off axis. Many ole timers are dropping dead and hopefully, the truly ignorant hateful Americans will eventually be 6 ft. under and loose their voice.

I totally appreciate that the demographics are CHANGING...FAST!'s unfortunate that so many millions of citizens are terrified but they can educate themselves and their families, leave the USA, or shake hands and with the rest us.

Tomorrow is a new day and I look forward to moving right along with my fellow Americans! VIVA AMERICA! VIVA! GORA!

Posted by beach bum, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood,
on Sep 8, 2015 at 9:04 pm

too much.

Posted by beach bum, a resident of Another Pleasanton neighborhood,
on Sep 8, 2015 at 9:10 pm

Tom, both partied pander to racial division in their own way. If you don;t recognize this basic reality, well, you're more naive than I thought.

Posted by Tom Cushing, a resident of another community,
on Sep 8, 2015 at 10:58 pm

BB -- I'm generally leery of equivalence claims between the two major Parties -- they're often a throwaway from somebody who doesn't care to think overmuch about it. I have no idea if that applies to you, so howsabout elaborating your comment and making your case?

Posted by Mai Tai, a resident of another community,
on Sep 9, 2015 at 1:16 am

Notice how Tom stays away from the now known liar named Hillary. What has Trump lied about Tom? Trump doesn't have the FBI breathing down his back. What scandal as of late, or in the past has Trump been involved in compared to Hillary? Not very good at deflection are you? And you are/were a lawyer?

And while we're at it, why is your president not calling one of his town hall meetings regarding the recent rise in the shooting deaths of police officers?

Now, cuddle up with your furry ones, and let the brave people who are not scared fight the good fight.

Posted by Tom Cushing, a resident of another community,
on Sep 9, 2015 at 7:24 am

Yup -- I suck, and everything I didn't write about -- well, that sucks too. Thanks for sharing.

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Sep 9, 2015 at 9:15 am

Mai Tai has no [c'mon Cholo -- there are limits.]

Posted by Mai Tai, a resident of another community,
on Sep 9, 2015 at 2:33 pm

Poor Cholo. [It sounds no better coming from you, MT. "Both benches have been warned."]

Posted by Jill Nance, a resident of Walnut Creek,
on Sep 10, 2015 at 12:50 am

I'm not sure what to make out of the Cholo vs Mai Tai tiff. However, it appears that the moderator, Tom Cushing perhaps?, allows free speech to flow in one direction. For instance, Cholo made some insensitive remarks:

"Many ole timers are dropping dead and hopefully, the truly ignorant hateful Americans will eventually be 6 ft. under and loose their voice."

Sounds like hate speech to me. Yet Tom Cushing disregards this type of comment in his blog. The question is, why?

Posted by s.p. tetzlaff, a resident of another community,
on Sep 10, 2015 at 6:16 am

Demographic's do not lie..the core base of the republican party: old,rich & racist white people (especially men) is disappearing & their stranglehold on wealth & thus political power is diminishing, rightly so. California leads the nation in trends & the good old days of Reagan republicanism is dead here replaced by a more inclusive democratic vision fueled by people of color & women. Wise republican strategists realize without brown/black people & women they are doomed. Trump is having his day but revealing the true base feelings of the republican party & alienating those he'll need to be elected president. The swan-song of old white people holding power is being heard loud & clear. From a 61 yr old white guy.

Posted by Dave, a resident of Danville,
on Sep 10, 2015 at 10:31 am

All you have to do is look at the delegates at the Republican National Convention every four years. Almost entirely older, white faces. That's not inclusive and it is not a winning strategy -- unless they are successful in their ongoing efforts to disenfranchise the poor, the young, and people of color.

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Sep 10, 2015 at 3:31 pm

I agree.

A sea of faces: Web Link

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Sep 10, 2015 at 3:34 pm

I hope that this images pop up: Web Link

Posted by Tom Cushing, a resident of another community,
on Sep 12, 2015 at 8:10 am

Web Link

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,708 views

Community foundations want to help local journalism survive
By Tim Hunt | 20 comments | 1,536 views

Pop open the beer at the holiday table
By Deborah Grossman | 1 comment | 702 views