Pleasanton school trustees move toward a school bond | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | DanvilleSanRamon.com |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

Pleasanton school trustees move toward a school bond

Uploaded: Feb 2, 2016
Pleasanton school trustees took a necessary first step toward consideration of putting a school facilities bond before the voters.
Trustees directed staff to work with consultants to develop a survey to weigh public opinion on a bond measure. The staff has estimated that $500 million could be spent updating and improving facilities. That’s one hunk of change considering voters passed a $69.8 bond measure in 1997. It’s nearly 20 years later, but the cost of money has not increased seven-fold in that time.
Given that parcel tax measures failed twice during the recession, the trustees will need to put forward an excellent argument to convince voters to invest. It will be most interesting to see the breakdown per $100,000 of assessed value to calculate the impact on property taxes.
The bond payments will vary according to assessed valuation as opposed to a parcel tax that is a flat amount whether it is a modest single-family home or a Class A office building. The owners of commercial property as well as those folks who own expensive homes in Ruby Hill and other affluent pockets will pay the majority of the bond if it passes.
The big difference now is at the state level where the matching money from state bonds has been expended. School advocates have qualified a $9 billion school bond for the November ballot. State voters have not considered an education construction bond measure since 2006. The governor, while not taking a firm position, has not backed it, arguing that the program needs to be reformed. The prior program matched local dollars so the state picked up half of the cost.
That program worked well because school districts do not have any margin to set aside enough money from operating fund to cover major capital costs. The state has played a major role in capital projects for decades and needs to step back into that role.
Looking across Interstate 580, you can see the challenges that the Dublin district is facing with student enrollment far exceeding estimates on the eastside where schools are overcrowded and the district is working to build another school. The challenge of building a new school means having developers pay all of the cost or passing a bond to match developer funds with local taxpayers’ money. That can be a steep climb to convince residents elsewhere in the city that the bond is in their best interest.
San Ramon has faced a similar challenge in the Dougherty Valley where enrollment far out-stripped the estimates in a master-planned development that was as well thought out as any I have seen.
This will be a very interesting year with the November ballot because there likely will be a many measures competing for dollars and public attention.

Comments

 +   1 person likes this
Posted by taxpayer, a resident of Downtown,
on Feb 4, 2016 at 7:20 pm

"The challenge of building a new school means having developers pay all of the cost or passing a bond to match developer funds with local taxpayers’ money."

How on earth can you not see that it MUST be on the backs of the developers to pay for this? They are the ones to profit from the building of more homes, I gain nothing from it other than more traffic. I will never vote to give a single dollar to the school district until they show some real fiscal responsibility for the money they already have. I am aware of the arguments that cutting back on daily expenses does not allow rebuilding infrastructure. However, any organization that so poorly uses the funds they already have can never be trusted with more.

Vote NO on any tax or bond that gives more money to the irresponsible district. Show some fiscal accountability first, then ask me for more money.


To post your comment, please login or register at the top of the page. This topic is only for those who have signed up to participate by providing their email address and establishing a screen name.

Valley Trails site is poor location for school
By Tim Hunt | 7 comments | 671 views

Matisse into Diebenkorn
By John A. Barry | 11 comments | 359 views