The VEEPstakes 1: GOP Edition | Raucous Caucus | Tom Cushing | |

Local Blogs

Raucous Caucus

By Tom Cushing

E-mail Tom Cushing

About this blog: The Raucous Caucus shares the southpaw perspectives of this Boomer on the state of the nation, the world, and, sometimes, other stuff. I enjoy crafting it to keep current, and occasionally to rant on some issue I care about deeply...  (More)

View all posts from Tom Cushing

The VEEPstakes 1: GOP Edition

Uploaded: Jul 12, 2016

Both parties will be selecting Vice Presidential candidates within the next few weeks. Neither choice is clear. The Republicans’ open-carry lovefest in Cleveland precedes the Dem gathering in Philly, so they get to go first. Who’s your choice? Winner gets a free subscription to this fine publication.

Here are some of the individuals prominently mentioned as possibilities. The candidate has indicated only that he’d prefer somebody who is familiar with government, which makes awfully perfect sense.

Mike Pence (age 58): the Indiana governor seems to be gathering a head of steam, but a casual googling contained three ‘news’ entries in the past day about why he will—and won’t -- be the nominee. The times have thrust some prominence upon him as a social conservative and he’s aligned with The Presump on immigration. He’d have to forego a re-election bid this fall; it is apparently not a sure-thing, despite Hoosieriana being a solidly red state.

Jeff(erson Beauregard) Sessions (69): the Alabama Senator since 1996 has been tapped as an advisor on national security matters, and shares space on matters of immigration. It’s not real clear how he helps geopolitically, as the south is already as crimson as his law school alma mater, but he’s a capable campaigner – so much so that he ran unopposed in 2014. There’s a lot of smart money on him.

John Kasich (64): the re-elected Governor of Ohio makes great sense to me, but the GOP has made a habit of not doing what I think is a good idea. He’d bring all the Congressional and executive experience and horsepower that made him a formidable candidate – in any other year. He’s also wildly popular at home, perhaps the swingin’est state of them all. He opposed The Nom on many issues, however, and is continually being courted by the Never-Ts to usurp the presidential nomination in his home state. If he could be persuaded, it might present an interesting opportunity for papering-over the divisions within the party, but I doubt he can be.

Newt Gingrich (73): the hardy perennial professor and darling of … somebody. He’s been around as long as Hillary, however, and has racked-up similar levels of negativity. The contrast between him and some possible bright young-un on the Dem side wouldn’t help. Besides, if the ticket was elected, Newt’s past flexible loyalties might raise concerns that he’d be another Frank Underwood.

Chris Christie (53): governor of New Jersey. Christie is an aggressive campaigner who could take the fight to the opposition, like he took down Marco Rubio. His local popularity has nose-dived, however, a record that would be made amply clear. His recent behavior has seemed more toady than heir-apparent, as if he was seeking a position as vice-valet. I’m guessing the George Washington Bridge is once again closed in the Manhattan-bound direction.

Lt. Gen. Mike Flynn (ret.) (57): he’s been appropriately critical of the Administration since being deposed from his position as Defense Intelligence chief in 2014. He is said to be direct and his management style “chaotic,” which only the boss may properly appreciate. Further, some of his non-defense-related positions and affiliations may be tough to swallow – he is a recently self-described “pro-choice Democrat.”

Here are some others, a few of whom have apparently bowed-out:

TN Sen. Bob Corker
SC Gov. Niki Haley
ND Sen. John Thune (no, wait – make that South Dakota)
AR Sen. Tom Cotton
Present or former Govs Palin (gasp, but it’s happened before), Huckabee, Brewer, Fallin, Martinez or Sandoval

Of all those, NV Gov. Sandoval is most substantial, and intriguing. He probably has a better, safer shot at greater prominence during another cycle, however.

Okay, Republicans – the floor is all your’n. Who’s your choice?
What is it worth to you?


Posted by SHale99, a resident of San Ramon,
on Jul 12, 2016 at 4:36 pm

SHale99 is a registered user.

Is 'none of the above' a reasonable answer?

Posted by Tom Cushing, a resident of Alamo,
on Jul 12, 2016 at 4:42 pm

It probably won't win.

You might want to suggest somebody else, but note that Bea Elsa Babb is sitting this one out.

Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on Jul 12, 2016 at 5:30 pm

Michael Austin is a registered user.

The republican convention in Cleveland and the democratic convention in Philadelphia may be repeats of the Chicago democratic 1968 convention.

Every one with a beef will be front and center with their demands.

The fittest survivor will emerge from each convention for the real war in November.

Posted by Sam, a resident of Oak Hill,
on Jul 12, 2016 at 6:08 pm

@Michael Austin

I don't know why you think that this year's Democratic convention is going to be all that tumultuous. In case you missed the news, Sanders has endorsed Hillary Clinton. Are there still going to be some differences in viewpoints among the attendees? Sure, just like there are at every convention.

The Republican convention, on the other hand, is sure to be a circus. Bring your popcorn for that one.

Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on Jul 12, 2016 at 7:55 pm

Michael Austin is a registered user.


To name a few disrupters:
Roe V Wade.
Pro Life.
Death Penalty supporters.
Anti environmental legislation foes.
Anti tax and spend forces.
The list is endless.

Posted by Sam, a resident of Oak Hill,
on Jul 13, 2016 at 7:11 pm

My Prediction: I think that Trump is going to go with Gingrich. You heard it here first, folks!

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Jul 15, 2016 at 12:12 pm

trump + pence = Web Link

ps I'm still in Oregon and then in 2 days I'm off to Yuba City, Sacramento River for more and more and more fishing!

I've been away DEEP SEA Fishing and having the best time of my life! I've had lots of fished smoked so when I return, I will join my dinner buds for a smoked fish treat...HOORAY! MY TOMATOES ARE BEING WATCHED BY A FRIEND AND THEY WILL BE RIPE RIPE RIPE WHEN I'M HOME. I'VE HAVEN'T BEEN FISHING FOR 3+ WEEKS FOR YEARS...IT IS AS CLOSE TO HEAVEN AS I WILL EVER BE!


Posted by rosalindr, a resident of San Ramon,
on Jul 15, 2016 at 10:15 pm

rosalindr is a registered user.

Donald's inexperience as a Republican is showing. I read that he's having buyer's remorse now that he's finding out what Pence's positions on social issues are. Donald must have picked Pence off of the same list he got for Supreme Court Justices.

There is still hope that the Republicans will nominate someone else at their Convention. They really don't want Hillary to win and most sane Republicans know Trump is the best gift they could give her.

Bea Elsa Babb! I read that three times before I got it. He/she will definitely be at the Republican Convention and I hope his/her mischief stirs things up. Go for it Bea!


Posted by Tom Cushing, a resident of Alamo,
on Jul 16, 2016 at 6:42 am

Good eye, Roz! I thought Lou Cypher would be too obvious.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

I Do I Don't: How to build a better marriage Page 15
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,146 views

Pop open the beer at the holiday table
By Deborah Grossman | 3 comments | 1,066 views

Local foundation tracks the state of giving here
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 457 views