Prop 64: Waiting to Inhale? | Raucous Caucus | Tom Cushing | |

Local Blogs

Raucous Caucus

By Tom Cushing

E-mail Tom Cushing

About this blog: The Raucous Caucus shares the southpaw perspectives of this Boomer on the state of the nation, the world, and, sometimes, other stuff. I enjoy crafting it to keep current, and occasionally to rant on some issue I care about deeply...  (More)

View all posts from Tom Cushing

Prop 64: Waiting to Inhale?

Uploaded: Oct 17, 2016

After twenty years’ dabbling in legal medical marijuana and with no apocalypse in-sight (sorry, Trumpophiles), this Proposition extends legalization to recreational use in California by anyone 21 years or older.

It also taxes both the cultivation and sale of the drug, and earmarks most of its likely $1Billion annual revenue stream for youth programs, including drug education, prevention, and treatment (60%); alleviation of environmental damage left over from illegal marijuana production (20%); and programs designed to reduce impaired driving under its influence (20%). The Legislative Analyst also predicts that “tens of $millions” will be saved locally, in foregone drug enforcement and incarceration costs.

The reeferendum* is supported by numerous pols and the state Dems and Greens, as well as most major newspapers (including the conservative Orange County Register); it is opposed by the state GOP and Libertarians, many localities and a mix of pols (DiFi and our own Catharine Baker, for instance), as well as many law enforcement-related entities. It leads in most polls, roughly 60-40%.

Yessers have out-financed the Nos, by about $18 million to $2 million. The arguments in favor are mostly pragmatic: that the current ban is outdated and its obvious flouting breeds a general disrespect, that bringing this major industry out of the shadows allows its regulation, taxation and diversion of funds away from organized crime, the revenue will be used primarily for youth prevention, and that police, prosecution and prison resources are better directed elsewhere.

Opponents argue that highway fatalities will rise generally and via impairment, that the Prop doesn’t zone small-time cultivation away from schools, that it will draw-not-discourage organized crime, that smoking-positive TV ads may ensue, and that its abuse burden will fall most heavily on low-income neighborhoods.

As for me? I am having a very difficult time getting excited over this one.

Admittedly, my own experience from long ago/far away was not pleasant in either the process or the effect (to my chagrin, I was this guy), so I lack much direct motivation to care. I do wonder about adding another product to the cornucopia of things that make people act lethargic and stupid.

On the other hand, I can’t get very concerned about the youth angle, given the drug’s current general availability to those who would choose to partake. And the organized crime argument is absurd – they aren’t particularly efficient producers of products (Sinaloa brand sizzling hot sauce? Mafioso Marinara? – call me when those show up at Trader Joe’s), rather they thrive on illegality. Similarly, the poor poor-neighborhoods notion is ridiculously paternalistic, and cynical to-boot. When was the last time the GOP was actually worried about anyone in poverty?

I conclude on balance that the ‘view’ – the cost/benefit of the current system, just ain’t worth its ‘climb.’ Pot may be slightly negative in terms of its long term effects on users, but I’d group it closer to bacon-cheese-double whoppers than cocaine in terms of 'things I know better than to ingest.' Further, the current illegality does divert resources from bigger problems. And it has led to unnecessary violence and environmental degradation, as well.

So it may be time to end this particular Prohibition in our state. I’ll give it a small ‘yes,’ with a big shrug.

* not mine -- suggested by a fellow A's partisan who calls himself 'Monkeyball.' I couldn't resist, even if I should have.
Local Journalism.
What is it worth to you?


Posted by rosalindr, a resident of San Ramon,
on Oct 17, 2016 at 2:26 pm

rosalindr is a registered user.

I'm surprised it is opposed by Libertarians. The Libertarian candidate for President, Gary Johnson, owns a Marijuana company and is, well, a well-known pot head. Someone should tell the California Libertarians that they are supposed to be for smaller government and fewer regulations on personal freedom!

Posted by Tom Cushing, a resident of Alamo,
on Oct 17, 2016 at 5:52 pm

Hi Roz: I thought that was odd, too, given Mr. what's a leppo's advocacy. They do show up as opposing it on the ballotpedia Prop 64 website, but that appears to be a mistake -- here Web Link they say they support the CA Prop on marijuana legalization, as well as several others.

Thanks for catching that, seestah!

Posted by Michael Austin, a resident of Pleasanton Meadows,
on Oct 17, 2016 at 8:00 pm

Michael Austin is a registered user.

A few years ago 2009 - 2012 or so, the federal Government was shutting down the Marijuana retail outlets in California. Every time they shut one down, I enjoyed a nice chuckle.

People with weak social skills, and failures with their lives, systematically tune out and turn on for personal self esteem, although short, the tune out, turn on moment, is short lived. They simply repeat the experience, until they are fried, AKA Timothy Leary

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Danville,
on Oct 23, 2016 at 12:41 pm

Lobelia inflata is an excellent option. Also used to help some folks stop smoking.

but, HACKING is more exciting....i rest my case

Indian Tobacco = Lobelia Inflata, available in tobacco stores...tee hee

guess where?

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Oct 23, 2016 at 12:43 pm

Sacred Use of Tobacco:

Web Link

i rest my case...

Posted by Pololo Mololo, a resident of Livermore,
on Oct 23, 2016 at 12:56 pm

Most of the time my buds are more interested in messing with somebody's radio...that's a fun way to take down somebody else's drone...duh

who needs weed? this is waaaaaay more fun...and I mean it...

later for pot...

Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Oct 24, 2016 at 10:14 am

End of Life: Web Link

I certainly plan to go out on a cloud. It's a peaceful way to fly away...and I mean it!

End of life is a wonderful time to say goodby to loved ones. If you're relaxed, it's also comforting for friends and family.

Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

I Do I Don't: How to build a better marriage Page 15
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,145 views

Pop open the beer at the holiday table
By Deborah Grossman | 3 comments | 1,064 views

Local foundation tracks the state of giving here
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 455 views