The Washington D.C. swamp at work? | Tim Talk | Tim Hunt | |

Local Blogs

Tim Talk

By Tim Hunt

E-mail Tim Hunt

About this blog: I am a native of Alameda County, grew up in Pleasanton and currently live in the house I grew up in that is more than 100 years old. I spent 39 years in the daily newspaper business and wrote a column for more than 25 years in add...  (More)

View all posts from Tim Hunt

The Washington D.C. swamp at work?

Uploaded: Mar 9, 2017
When President Trump talks of draining the swamp of Washington D.C., consider this example reported by the Wall Street Journal and the Los Angeles Times.

Two days before the Obama Administration ended, Federal Transit Administration Administrator Carolyn Flowers approved a $647 million federal grant for the CalTrain commuter service on the Peninsula. The federal grant was to electrify the service (currently the engines are diesel-powered) and to make the right-of-way suitable for the governor’s pet high-speed rail boondoggle should it ever reach the Bay Area.

California Republicans in Congress asked incoming Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao to delay the grant until an audit is finished on the rail line. An internal document obtained by the Times in January showed the first segment from nowhere to nowhere in the Southern San Joaquin Valley was already 50 percent over budget. Republicans in the valley have been particularly critical of the high-speed rail project.

The governor reached out to the secretary with hand-written note, asking to talk. Contractors were set to begin work this month on the Peninsula.

Remember President Obama’s 2009 stimulus bill for shovel-ready projects—the high-speed rail line was included and was supposed to be under construction in 2012. The Obama administration kept finding ways to extend the deadline. Last year, the Legislature diverted $600 from the bond funding to CalTrain to electrify the 51-mile line and make it compatible with the high-speed rail.

The upshot of all of this—the swamp—Flowers now is working for a contractor, Aecom, on the Caltrain electrification project. She joined the firm 13 days after sending the letter approving the grant. Two other senior Obama administration officials have taken the same path from overseeing federal transportation projects to working for private sector companies building them.
Until this last move, Flowers had spent her entire career in public transportation agencies.

Draw your own conclusions.

Incidentally, the governor’s preferred—and thus far only ongoing source of funding for the choo-choo—continues in the doldrums. The February auction of cap-and-trade credits resulted in just 16.5 percent of the emissions allowances being sold.

It is the fourth auction in a row with mediocre results for those seeking more revenue for the government. The state will receive $8.2 million instead of the $600 million it could have with a sold-out auction.

Gov. Brown proposed to spend $2.2 billion on climate change blockers in his budget, including $800 million on the train boondoggle.

The result will be a question of whether the Democratic leadership can hold its caucus together to pass more climate change legislation to solidify the program beyond its 2020 sunset. Without that, investors likely continue to shy away from the credits, creating further budget challenges for the train and other initiatives.

That would be a welcome gift to taxpayers.

Local Journalism.
What is it worth to you?


Posted by DKHSK, a resident of Bridle Creek,
on Mar 9, 2017 at 9:13 am

DKHSK is a registered user.


I read about the audit a week ago and wondered whether you were going to write about it. Thx.

It seems to me that Brown and the Democrats are going for broke on transportation projects. Now they're proposing doubling of registration fees (the reason Grey Davis was kicked out of office) and a 45% increase in gas taxes just so they have money to fix our roads.

Imagine, all the money being sent to the state transportation department, and they need more JUST TO FIX OUR ROADS?!

This state is a basket case and the voting democrats can't (or more likely won't) see the elephant in the room.

And more to the point of why democrats won't see the elephant is explained very clearly in this link: Web Link

The safe link goes to a website from NYU and goes to great length to describe an experiment that was just carried out where the genders of one of the Trump/Clinton debate were reversed, i.e., Clinton was represented by a male and Trump, female.

The reaction of the mostly academic, and thus democrat, audience is priceless and the few quotes made it clear that their bias was based on appearance rather than on message.

Anyway, take a look.


Posted by Cholo, a resident of Livermore,
on Mar 9, 2017 at 11:40 am

It seems to me like lots of folks are concerned about draining the swamp.

If you scroll down to the 4th line of images, second from left, a swamp animal:

Web Link


Posted by Sam, a resident of Oak Hill,
on Mar 13, 2017 at 8:39 am

Gee, Tim, you actually sounded pretty reasonable in this essay until you reminded everyone that you're a climate change denier.

Posted by DKHSK, a resident of Bridle Creek,
on Mar 13, 2017 at 8:59 am

DKHSK is a registered user.

Gee Sam, your response sounded reasonable and well thought out with lots of facts to support your conclusion.

Said nobody...EVER!


Posted by DKHSK, a resident of Bridle Creek,
on Mar 13, 2017 at 9:02 am

DKHSK is a registered user.

And speaking of climate change deniers: Web Link

The end of that particular gravy train for faux-scientists is near. They're the ones screaming the loudest.


Follow this blogger.
Sign up to be notified of new posts by this blogger.



Post a comment

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Stay informed.

Get the day's top headlines from sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.

Community foundations want to help local journalism survive
By Tim Hunt | 20 comments | 1,724 views

I Do I Don't: How to build a better marriage Ch. 1, page 1
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 1,404 views

Pop open the beer at the holiday table
By Deborah Grossman | 3 comments | 888 views