School board discusses plan for Measure C oversight

Members question committee's mandate

With the May 5 passage of Measure C, members of the San Ramon Valley Unified School District Board of Education are now faced with living up to the assurances given in the ballot language that a committee be created to oversee disbursement of the funds raised.

At their June 23 meeting, board members discussed what the oversight committee would do and how it would function. The committee would consist of five residents with children in the district and four residents without children enrolled. Terms would be three years although parents would leave if their child no longer attended district schools. The group's mandate would be to review the district's expenditures of Measure C generated funds.

Board member Greg Marvel questioned whether that "after the fact" oversight is what the ballot language mandated.

"Yes, we'll have an independent audit, but the horse has already left the barn," he said.

Marvel compared the Measure C committee with the Facilities Oversight Committee, which examines expenditures before they are approved.

Trustee Paul Gardner disagreed, saying that he does not believe it is necessary to structure the committee as a body that will give approval to budget decisions.

"This is another level of audit," he stated. "I don't think it was intended, nor is it practical, to put expenditures before this committee."

Marvel responded, "I'm not saying the committee needs to replace this board. I want to make sure that the spirit of the measure is honored."

He added, "Approving an independent auditor's report doesn't have the oomph. I don't want supporters coming back and criticizing us over this."

According to Marvel, the ballot language itself seems to indicate that the committee's purview is how the funds are used

"'Are spent' implies to me concurrent or pre - I think from a legal perspective that's a critical difference," he said.

Rachel Hurd, a board member and the co-chairwoman of the Measure C campaign, agreed that the committee's mandate should precede the disbursement of the funds.

"My vision is that they would be plugged into the budget development process," she explained.

Board President Bill Clarkson presented the toughest question, asking what the board will do if the economic situation worsens and they are forced to make decisions counter to what the oversight committee suggests?

"I think that some of these people are going to feel strongly about certain programs," he said.

Gardner pointed to the ballot language for the answer.

"We never said we would spend money on any specific programs," he said.

They also discussed how to form the committee.

"I don't think we should cherry pick this committee," said Clarkson. "I think it should be a broad selection. And I think we'd better be ready for them to criticize us."

School Superintendent Steve Enoch said staff would take the concerns of the board into consideration and would craft a resolution that would be brought back for the August meeting.


Like this comment
Posted by Dawn
a resident of Alamo
on Jul 1, 2009 at 9:59 am

Agreeing with Clarkson's view that this oversight committee should not be 'cherry-picked,' and would like to know how candidates for this committee are first presented (volunteer?), then chosen. Would also like to know who does the choosing.

Also agree that this oversight committee is to be given their say BEFORE funds are allocated and/or spent.

I am ignorant of the committee process and would appreciate having it explained. If someone can point me to a web site where the methods are laid out, that would be great. Thanks in advance for your help!

Like this comment
Posted by Geoff Gillette
Danville Weekly reporter
on Jul 1, 2009 at 10:24 am

Geoff Gillette is a registered user.

That is a good question. The verbiage provided in the draft resolution said that the membership will be solicited but does not say how. Before they approve the draft resolution that will question will need to be more fully answered. And we will run a followup story since we have received e-mails from other concerned readers who want to know how the committee will be filled.

Like this comment
Posted by Dawn
a resident of Alamo
on Jul 1, 2009 at 6:17 pm


Thanks for your response. Will look for the follow-up story.

Again, if anyone out there can point me in the right direction to learn about the formation of this oversight committee, I would really appreciate it!


Like this comment
Posted by Rob
a resident of Danville
on Jul 1, 2009 at 8:30 pm

You should probably attend tthe next school bd meeting. If you go to you can see when they post the next meeting. I think they post the agendas so you can find out if it's going to be discussed. Good luck.

Like this comment
Posted by Rick Pshaw
a resident of Danville
on Jul 2, 2009 at 8:00 am

I would hazard a guess that the selection process will be quite similar to that used for the Facilities Oversight Advisory Committee - FOAC (originally named the Measure A Citizen's Oversight Committee).

The SRVUSD website has a good description:
Web Link

Like this comment
Posted by Rick
a resident of Danville
on Jul 3, 2009 at 6:01 pm

When's the Danville Weakly gonna report on the tea parties going on at the corner of Crow Canyon/Camino Tassajara? They grow every time, and they're only gonna get bigger. Just the beginning oh ye oppressors...

Just the beginning.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

The valley needs strong leadership on BART board
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 2,321 views

3 Great Ways to Showcase Your Strengths on College Applications!
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 228 views