Express endorsements: Experience matters


Contra Costa County's District 2 is a unique and diverse area, with several candidates running for a seat on the Board of Supervisors. Encompassing most of the San Ramon Valley, the Lamorinda area and part of Walnut Creek, the district was redrawn last summer.

While the San Ramon Valley was overseen by now-District 3 Supervisor Mary Nejedly-Piepho for several years, Gayle Uilkema took over the seat in July 2011.

Uiklema, who died May 19, announced her retirement from the Board of Supervisors after nearly two decades of service; she died Saturday of ovarian cancer.

The lack of incumbents for the county's second-most populated district gave rise to three well-qualified candidates for supervisor: Community College Governing Board President Tomi Van de Brooke, Danville Mayor Candace Andersen and solar energy professor Sean White.

As the county deals with pension reform, economic development and budget concerns, the newest supervisor will need to bring innovative solutions, strong priorities and experience to the table. Although two of the three candidates have experience working on boards, committees and commissions, the San Ramon Express believes Candace Andersen is the right choice for District 2 supervisor.

While both Andersen and Van de Brooke have a plethora of valuable experience, and both agree that county funds need to be re-prioritized to focus on police, fire and infrastructure, the two decades Andersen has spent in local government will prove instrumental in dealing with various entities throughout the county.

Throughout her career, Andersen has sat on over 30 commissions and committees, several of which she could continue to be involved with as a supervisor. A trained lawyer, team leader and consensus builder, Andersen is known to be gregarious and consistently prepared. Andersen has been the mayor of Danville twice and continues to work with other cities on Tri-Valley initiatives such as iGate and the Washington, D.C. mayor's conference.

Still, divisive issues regarding Andersen's personal beliefs were raised during the Express' candidate forum and debate. Van de Brooke has relentlessly tried to turn county funding for Planned Parenthood into a major tenet of the race, insinuating that Andersen's religious beliefs would prevent her from funding clinics that perform abortions. Andersen remained steadfast and polished in her assertion that she had no intention of cutting funding to Planned Parenthood, noting her support of women's health and sex education.

Andersen's well-researched, smooth presentation spoke highly of her ability to negotiate difficult situations, even in the face of differing opinions. Although Van de Brooke started her own public relations company and has worked with the Contra Costa Council and California Alliance for Jobs, her antagonistic presentation does not bode well for the Board of Supervisors.

Instead, focusing on divisive issues during various debates has diverted attention from real issues within the county, specifically pension reform and budgetary concerns. Andersen is well informed about the cost of employee benefits -- the county is underfunded by $1.1 billion and spends 37 percent of its payroll on pensions -- while Van de Brooke wants to base county employee compensation on salary surveys.

While both agree that growth outside the urban limit line (or urban growth boundary in San Ramon) is misaligned with voter desires, Andersen's experience on the Danville Town Council will put her more in line with voters. Her hard-line approach against development on ridgelines and in rural areas, advocating instead for building on the valley floor, will serve well as the county hears testimony on developments in the Tassajara Valley such as New Farm and a cemetery.

Although either Andersen or Van de Brooke could do the job, Andersen's polished presentation, local government experience and positive attitude make her the right candidate for supervisor at this time. The area is fortunate to have outstanding candidates and we believe Candace Andersen will do what's best for the entire San Ramon Valley, District 2 and the county.


Like this comment
Posted by Voter
a resident of Danville
on May 19, 2012 at 12:41 pm

Danville Express has been running for weeks a large, paid, ad for Candace Andersen. Of course you endorse your paid advertising client. You are hardly a neutral, unbiased source.

Many of my neighbors here in Danville are so upset with Candace Andersen allowing the illegal Magee Ranch development that there is no way we would ever vote for someone who is a pawn of rich developers.

Like this comment
Posted by Wise Owl
a resident of Alamo
on May 19, 2012 at 2:26 pm

I think the Danville Express is a highly ethical and unbiased publication shimmering with journalistic integrity.

Pawn of rich developers? Show me proof. Cite the location on the web so we can all take a look at it.

Like this comment
Posted by jjjj
a resident of Alamo
on May 19, 2012 at 3:18 pm

I agree with you voter... the wise old hal or better known as the old fool is still at it Anderson is not the answer.. tomi, tomi

Like this comment
Posted by Voter
a resident of Danville
on May 19, 2012 at 3:35 pm

Look at March 20,2012, town forum section, re "No on Summerhill Homes", and follow up articles, and can google "No on Summerhill Homes". She spent all her time putting up campaign signs and no time listening to us in Danville affected by illegal development.

Like this comment
Posted by Wise Owl
a resident of Alamo
on May 20, 2012 at 8:59 am

It would take only a rudimentary knowledge of semantics to discern that Wise Owl is NOT Mr. Bailey. However, such assessment is obviously beyond the ability of a smattering of people.

And by the way, I'm still waiting for proof that Candace is a Pawn of rich developers.

Like this comment
Posted by guynextdoor
a resident of Danville
on May 21, 2012 at 10:10 am

Good work Express Editorial Board. Well reasoned endorsement. The position of Supervisor is bigger than a single issue. I'll vote for Ms. Anderson.

Like this comment
Posted by Voter
a resident of Danville
on May 25, 2012 at 8:53 am

I just received in the mail from Candace Andersen an extremely negative, hit piece attack on her opponent in this election. The entire mailer slams her opponent, but mentions nothing about Ms. Andersen.

Ms. Andersen must be desperate, to drop to this level of mudslinging. Instead of discussing why we should vote for her,it is full of partisan attacks on her opponent.

Reality is Ms. Andersen is a pawn of the wealthy developers, as witnessed by her support of the illegal development by Summerhill Homes of the Magree Ranch property in Danville.

I do not care that she is a Mormon, do not care that she is anti-choice, and anti-gay marriage. I do care that she abandoned us homeowners near Green Valley Elementary School and Los Cerros Middle School to let the rich developer ruin our neighborhood. She spent all her time putting up campaign signs, and no time trying to help her actual constituents.

If you care about greenspaces, the environment, traffic problems, and stopping the rich developers from paving over our community, do not vote for Candace Andersen.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

Couples: . . . “Joy is greater than sorrow,“ . . . “Nay, sorrow is the greater.”
By Chandrama Anderson | 1 comment | 1,037 views

Local venture capital fund set to close
By Tim Hunt | 1 comment | 505 views

Help beautiful Beatrice the bulldog put neglected days behind her
By Gina Channell-Allen | 2 comments | 292 views