Alamo man convicted of manslaughter for neighbor's 2012 death

Prosecutors argued Michael Littman pushed Doris Penico to her death down steep shared driveway after long-time dispute

A jury in Martinez convicted an Alamo man Friday of voluntary manslaughter for the death of a next-door neighbor with whom he had an ongoing feud.

The Contra Costa County jurors rejected a second-degree murder charge and found 60-year-old real estate broker Michael Littman guilty of the lesser charge in connection with the death of 59-year-old Doris Penico.

Prosecutors say Littman pushed Penico to her death down the steep shared driveway between their two homes in the 3000 block of Stonegate Drive on Aug. 27, 2012.

Littman was also convicted on charges of stalking and assault likely to cause great bodily injury for the beating of the victim's husband, Victor Penico, during the incident that led to Doris Penico's death.

He faces up to 12 years and eight months in prison.

"I am sincerely grateful for the hard work and commitment of this jury," deputy district attorney Molly Manoukian said. "They held Mr. Littman accountable for killing Doris Penico and beating Victor Penico."

During the trial, Manoukian argued that the neighbors had a longstanding dispute -- largely over the use of the shared driveway -- and Littman would frequently film and photograph the Penicos without their consent in the years leading up to the killing.

According to testimony from Contra Costa County sheriff's investigators, more than 100 video files, photos and documents recording the Penicos' actions in the shared driveway or on their own property were seized from Littman's home.

Manoukian told the jury that the defendant's behavior toward his next-door neighbors became increasingly threatening. In one instance, he drove quickly up the driveway toward the couple, who jumped into some bushes to escape.

The jury also saw hours of video-recordings taken from Littman's house and from security cameras installed at the victims' home.

One of the videos captured the Aug. 27, 2012 fight between Littman and Victor Penico and showed Littman push Doris Penico, causing her to fall down the steep driveway and suffer fatal injuries, according to prosecutors.

But Michael Cardoza, Littman's attorney, argued during the trial that Littman may have been guilty of being un-neighborly but didn't stalk or harass them and only started filming the Penicos on advice from an attorney after the couple threatened to sue him.

Cardoza told the jury that the defendant fought Victor Penico that day after being approached aggressively by him and merely "bumped" Doris Penico during the incident, but never meant to kill her.

The attorney said that while he isn't happy with Friday's verdict, he is glad the jury did not find Littman guilty of second-degree murder, which carries a 15 years-to-life prison sentence.

Victor Penico, who attended Friday's verdict hearing along with his adult son, said his family has been heavily affected by the loss of his wife of 33 years.

"It's not the same anymore," he said, his eyes downcast.

Penico said that while he believes Littman is guilty of second-degree murder, the jury's decision is one he and his family can live with.

"I respect what the jury did, I think there was some justice for Doris," he said.

A couple of the defendant's longtime friends said outside the courtroom Friday that they knew of Littman's ongoing dispute with the Penicos, but that they don't believe he is responsible for Doris Penico's death.

"We all thought it was a bad accident," said Kelly Madden, a family friend who attended much of the trial. "I think (Doris Penico) just lost her balance."

Penico said that he would have liked to see Littman taken into custody Friday.

Contra Costa County Superior Court Judge Charles Burch rejected a request Friday to jail the defendant, whom the prosecutor argued poses a danger to the community.

Burch said that while Littman "may have uniquely posed some sort of danger to Mrs. Penico," he has not found any evidence suggesting the defendant is a danger to anyone else.

Manoukian called the move "extremely unusual" for someone convicted of voluntary manslaughter.

The judge barred Littman from traveling outside of Contra Costa County from now until his March 7 sentencing. He no longer lives next-door to the Penicos.

— Bay City News Service


Like this comment
Posted by Julia
a resident of Alamo
on Jan 27, 2014 at 9:36 am

This is a very stupid accident...and all over a damn driveway. Hey people life is so much more valuable than a driveway easement...

It all has to do with ego and it appears they both are at fault.

There isn't just one life disrupted. Both families are going to feel this for for the rest of their life...Again, all because of a shared driveway that neither party could agree on....

Yes it all boils down to EGO

Thanks for listening, Julia Pardini from Alamo

Like this comment
Posted by P
a resident of Blackhawk
on Jan 27, 2014 at 11:52 am

Though I never heard of sharing a driveway before with a neighbor, I do think it is a bad design idea and I criticize the builder and township for allowing such a bad idea. I find it hard enough to share a fence with a neighbor when it is time to replace a fence. Our neighbor wants to patch up repair job and we want to replace then entire aged, deteriorated fence. Both of us will be living at our residences for a long time. With CA homes built so close together, it seems imperative that each house has its own driveway, yard, etc. to keep out of each others' way. Have you ever noticed that the more populated and closer the houses are built, the more aggressive and nasty people are in general. I just think it happens to all of life, including animals when their territories are encroached by suburban building. This feud in this article might not have ever happened with a better design idea of not sharing a driveway.

Like this comment
Posted by Tracy
a resident of Alamo
on Jan 27, 2014 at 1:36 pm

The fault still lyes on the man with a temper.

Sorry, but further commenting on this topic has been closed.

GE's re-organization reaches San Ramon digital headquarters
By Tim Hunt | 3 comments | 1,831 views

Sound and Fury over Vile and Slur-ry
By Tom Cushing | 67 comments | 1,035 views

Jazz and Abstraction
By John A. Barry and Bill Carmel | 0 comments | 180 views