Town Square

Post a New Topic

City Council approves controversial alcohol ordinance

Original post made on May 3, 2012

The Walnut Creek City Council voted unanimously Tuesday night to approve a controversial nuisance ordinance that will hold all alcohol-serving establishments in the city to the same standards. City officials said the ordinance will give city leaders more control over problem bars, such as those that consistently over-serve patrons or are venues for violence.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Wednesday, May 2, 2012, 2:02 PM

Comments (5)

Like this comment
Posted by Trish Hamilton
a resident of Danville
on May 3, 2012 at 7:06 am

This is ridiculous! More rules! More regulations! Let us be free! Stop punishing EVERYONE for the actions of a few! I believe we ALL have a right to enjoy visiting an establishment and it's horrible that these poor business owners and their customers are going to be paying the price...

If a few customers get rowdy, then use them to set an example. Have them serve the community through mandatory volunteering (LOL!) and allow them to give back to the community so they can attain a new perspective and perhaps allow them to gain a better understanding of what it means to contribute to a good cause and be part of a strong community.

Like this comment
Posted by LMP
a resident of Danville
on May 3, 2012 at 7:47 am

Good for WC for trying to keep their lovely city safe. I don't see how these regulations would harm any business that doesn't create an environment that endangers the public. If you can't behave like a civilized human being, don't come here.

Like this comment
Posted by Joe
a resident of San Ramon
on May 3, 2012 at 5:29 pm

Good for the Walnut Creek City Council. Why should tax payer dollars be used to clean-up the fallout from irresponsible bar owners. It is the city - citizens that should sue the bars.

Has anybody heard of Tips Training?

Like this comment
Posted by Concerned Citizen
a resident of Danville
on May 4, 2012 at 9:02 am

For those of you who don't realize, most of the cost of an alcoholic beverage in a bar is TAX. They are taxed by pour count, so if a bar over pours, then they lose money. The money collected through this taxation helps the entire community.

Patrons will simply move outside of Walnut Creek to consume their beverages and then commute longer to go home. You're not changing the behavior of the individuals causing the problem - you are ONLY damaging the businesses and communities.

Who do you think owns the bar? An individual in the community so as you're concerned about your "safety" in Walnut Creek, please be aware that you will now have MORE individuals coming home from other destinations where they have over-consumed driving back INTO Walnut Creek. Gee!... I hope no one gets hurt!...

Another good item out of this new regulation is that we'll have much more open store fronts available downtown. I'm pretty sure that those who disagree with me don't own businesses, are probably the folks that pay NO federal income taxes… or as I like to refer to them as “the 50%ers because ½ of our population doesn’t pay Federal income tax so why should they be concerned with happens in the government. It doesn’t cost them a dime! And for those that don’t understand accounting, payroll tax is NOT income tax. Income tax is levied on top of payroll tax.
I’m sure these people don't frequent these establishments so they have no context as to what actually occurs.

Next, they'll start banning dancing, gathering in groups, and free thought... They're already trying to take our free will.

I'm not a religious person and I've never read the Bible, but I understand it much better now when they say: "the meek will inherit the Earth." That means lesser intelligent human beings scavenging like dogs. If you want to know what that looks like, then talk to the two folks above...

Like this comment
Posted by ARD
a resident of Danville
on May 4, 2012 at 11:28 am

to "concerned Citizen" of Danville.
I suppose you consider YOURSELF an intelligent human being and anyone that disagrees with you is a scavenging dog. I had to read your raging rambling twice because your intelligence gets in the way of writing a legible comment that makes grammatical and contextual sense. I would not have wasted my time to reread, but I was trying to locate any fiber of intelligence or logic or actual facts.
Maybe you should frequent out of the area bars, and while you are at it, get an education and learn to write.

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Central Oregon population is soaring with former Californians
By Tim Hunt | 9 comments | 665 views

What Exactly Is FAFSA and Why Should You Complete It?
By Elizabeth LaScala | 0 comments | 288 views

Reasons to Love the A’s, Chapters Next
By Tom Cushing | 1 comment | 208 views