Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, September 11, 2023, 4:19 PM
Town Square
Danville council to discuss potential gun storage regulations
Original post made on Sep 12, 2023
Read the full story here Web Link posted Monday, September 11, 2023, 4:19 PM
Comments (4)
a resident of Danville
on Sep 12, 2023 at 6:30 am
Parent and Voter is a registered user.
The current gun laws already require the standards that Danville is proposing for homes with children. I hope that Danville does not let a few vocal people push thru the proposed changes.
What is sad is that drugs are killing large numbers of people... including children.
Yet the legalization of more and more drugs is occurring. Perhaps we need to take a look at that and also have strict standards for the storage of drugs in homes. Just a thought.
a resident of another community
on Sep 13, 2023 at 4:45 pm
Guns Unlimited Repair is a registered user.
The Danville City Council did the right thing by not going forward with a city ordinance that would just add another law that the State already has in place. The state has several laws that cover locking your guns up. The Moms Demand Action are not very educated on state or federal gun laws. The citizens of Danville are so lucky to have 5 members on the council that seem this as a request not needed.
Congratulations Danville!!
a resident of Danville
on Sep 14, 2023 at 10:44 am
Paul Clark is a registered user.
So once again, our Town Council is pursuing the "solution" to a non-existent problem because a couple of Liberal "transplants" are trying to use it to achieve their "objective" of a "gun free" town. As the other commenter has posted, State Law pre-empts any local ordinance respecting firearms. With all the issues with which Danville needs to deal, this seems like a waste of the council's time. As far as I can determine, the only recent gun deaths in Danville were at the hands of one of our county sheriff-run police department's officers. The former officer is serving a six-year prison term, and Danville has had to pay out nearly $10 million in reparations to the families of the two who were killed. I am not aware of any other citizen of Danville, irrespective of age being injured in any way by a firearm. It sort of defeats any reason for having a firearm in your home for personal protection if you have to have it both locked up and unloaded, but of course that's the real objective of those proposing the ordinance in the first place.
a resident of Danville
on Sep 14, 2023 at 12:41 pm
Bill Thompson is a registered user.
Would this ordinance also apply to firearms loaded with non-lethal ammunition?
I grew up on a farm and our shotguns were often loaded with rock salt to deter trespassers and varmints.
Rock salt is not lethal but it stings like heck.
Don't miss out
on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.
Post a comment
In order to encourage respectful and thoughtful discussion, commenting on stories is available to those who are registered users. If you are already a registered user and the commenting form is not below, you need to log in. If you are not registered, you can do so here.
Please make sure your comments are truthful, on-topic and do not disrespect another poster. Don't be snarky or belittling. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.
See our announcement about requiring registration for commenting.
Stay informed.
Get the day's top headlines from DanvilleSanRamon.com sent to your inbox in the Express newsletter.
Burning just one "old style" light bulb can cost $150 or more per year
By Sherry Listgarten | 10 comments | 2,187 views
Reflecting on lives this Thanksgiving Day
By Tim Hunt | 0 comments | 1,096 views
Premiere! “I Do I Don’t: How to build a better marriage” – Here, a page/weekday
By Chandrama Anderson | 0 comments | 552 views