Town Square

Post a New Topic

Would you vote for OTHER?

Original post made by [removed], another community, on Dec 13, 2011

Dear Editor,

District 2 is now a competitive election and soon district 3 will have a competitive candidate, but what happens when the choice of candidates is not the choice of a majority of voters? Now that would be an excellent Diablo View for Express research and Dolores’ capable engagement of readers, don’t you think?

In the past, mostly in humor among neighbors, there has been a movement to “Vote for OTHER” covered in postings to the Express Forum. If you review CoCoVote results for past elections you will find our candidate, as “OTHER” listed for all the votes cast for write-ins not registered or not gaining enough votes to be listed separately. After the Alaska Senate race was decided in favor of a write-in candidate last year, humorists throughout Contra Costa County are considering making “OTHER” their candidate to write-in in nearly all races. It makes the county election office jobs easier because they already have the category and it would be a simple effort to account for a large or small write-in vote for “OTHER.”

Dolores could add to her Diablo View on voters’ choices by examining “what if OTHER won?” Simply, a non-registered write-in cannot win the election and votes only count that are cast for registered candidates. But what if a candidate got a minority of votes to be elected when OTHER actually won the election? It certainly would not be a mandate for that candidate if voters illustrate that they would have preferred someone else. It takes us all back to the ballot measure by Al Shugart of Seagate Fame that wanted to add “none of the above” to the list of candidates in California. That measure failed but “OTHER” lives on.

Let’s ask your readers, “Would you vote for OTHER?”

Comments (1)

Like this comment
Posted by [removed]
a resident of Alamo
on Dec 22, 2011 at 8:29 am

Dear Editor,

UPDATE: A well-considered discussion of "what is a wasted vote?" was distributed among neighborhood e-exchanges yesterday. The challenge in the discussion is voting for candidate simply to be part of the winning campaign versus voting against a candidate simply because voters wish to register their discontent; is either a valued use of the privilege of voting?

What values do your readers use in casting their votes?

Don't miss out on the discussion!
Sign up to be notified of new comments on this topic.


Post a comment

Posting an item on Town Square is simple and requires no registration. Just complete this form and hit "submit" and your topic will appear online. Please be respectful and truthful in your postings so Town Square will continue to be a thoughtful gathering place for sharing community information and opinion. All postings are subject to our TERMS OF USE, and may be deleted if deemed inappropriate by our staff.

We prefer that you use your real name, but you may use any "member" name you wish.

Name: *

Select your neighborhood or school community: *

Comment: *

Verification code: *
Enter the verification code exactly as shown, using capital and lowercase letters, in the multi-colored box.

*Required Fields

Livermore trustees demonstrating wisdom
By Tim Hunt | 11 comments | 1,418 views

Material Matters
By John A. Barry | 0 comments | 164 views


2017 guide to summer camps

Looking for something for the kids to do this summer, learn something new and have fun? The 2017 Summer Camp Guide features local camps for all ages and interests.

Find Camps Here