Town Square

South Korea to sponsor Korean classes in Dougherty Valley

Original post made on Jun 7, 2011

If all goes according to plan, Dougherty Valley High School students will have the option to take two levels of Korean for their world language requirement, said Rob Stockberger, director of secondary education for the San Ramon Valley Unified School District (SRVUSD). Almost 57 percent of the school's students are Asian, and as that population in the Dougherty Valley has grown, Stockberger said interests have changed.

Read the full story here Web Link posted Tuesday, June 7, 2011, 5:18 PM


Like this comment
Posted by Harald A. Bailey
a resident of another community
on Jun 7, 2011 at 6:43 pm

Dear Editor,

Let us thank Rod for his outreach into our global community of neighbors. It is delightful memories of times in Korea and throughout southeast Asia, 1986 to 2003, that focuses the value of having USAmerican education focused on the welcomed economic relationships in Korea and many southeast Asian economies. Expatriate jobs are abundant to bring technologies to commercial success in Asian markets. The key is technical and language skills to bridge the reality that we are one economy.

Applause to Rod for his exceptional outreach,


Like this comment
Posted by psmacintosh
a resident of Danville
on Jun 8, 2011 at 12:04 pm

Are the basic necessities of good public education being so sufficiently meet (and the United States public's needs being well-serviced by the education provided--considering that we pay for such education) such that we can now turn our tax money's attention to teaching Korean language (and probably also history, culture, and who knows what else) in our American schools?
Wow! I'm still shocked by the apparent sense of priorities.

Like this comment
Posted by Dick P
a resident of Danville
on Jun 9, 2011 at 7:36 am

57% Asians!

Like this comment
Posted by psmacintosh
a resident of Danville
on Jun 9, 2011 at 3:22 pm

The ethnic-tisity of the neighborhood should really be irrelevant!
American public schools should be focused on teaching American history, values, language, culture (although that certainly is a mixture of cultures), and life skills foremost and first most-- benefit and foster American values preeminently.
We should desire students to be educated into how to:
Vote in America (understanding American politics, history, structure, and system),
Balance their checkbooks and operate their financial lives,
Obtain and payoff an American-style mortgage loan,
Survive and live well in an American city,
Successfully gain and maintain work in America in American jobs,
Operate a business,
Operate a household,
Become beneficial to their local society/neighborhood, and
Believe in and foster American values and the English language (as the common world language).
Certainly students need to learn about the World at large and as a whole, including a healthy dose and overview of World history, values, language, culture, etc..
But no single foreign country's "education" (which amounts to propoganda for their country at the exclusion of others) should take precedence over the two basic, higher priorities--to become proficient at living in America and to learn about the whole world generally. And no racial ethnic-tisity should be promoted by public education--that's a private, family matter and responsibility!
I know there would be many people who would argue against my opinion here--arguing that IF a neighborhood is highly black or hispanic or other origin background, that the schools therein should especially teach information and classes that focus in on those particular backgrounds of culture, history and language. I'm arguing that that is NOT public education's responsibility. That is not in the general interests of the general public all across America. That does not directly make students into better American citizens.
I'm arguing that we should focus on America, our commonality as Americans, and upon the English language (helping develop it into a universal world language). That it's our public schools job to assimilate us together as Americans, rather than spend public dollars to dis-assimulate us as Americans and foster assimilating us into other cultures, values, and languages.
I'm not saying it's ever wrong to give some space (public time and money) to one narrow, foreign culture. But accomplish the higher-priority "basics" of education first. And, in California, we can't even balance the governmental budget. Let alone take on another project and expanded scope of education.
Where does it stop? How do you define the limits of what we should pay for public education to do?
Please understand that the District is planning for much more than a simple "Korean language class" here.
It is an 'immersion" program, whereby a Korean teacher is brought in to teach all subjects (history, math, etc) in both Korean and English for many years and then perhaps stretching upward into many grade levels or following that group of students through their advancing grades. (that part of the plan is unclear to me?)
Developing a whole side curriculum with years of financial and time follow-through and commitment seems EXTREMELY INAPPROPRIATE for our current financially-strapped and poorly-achieving educational systems. It seems a clear case of over-committing and over-expanding in educational scope--spending public time, money, effort, energy, thought, and planning on lower priority objectives.
The District is planning to hire a foreign teacher. Regardless of WHO pays for him/her, it's an American job position that gets taken up. Then it takes administrative time and effort to manage and operate the position. It entails allowing a visa, etc.. It takes up classroom facilities and infrastructure--paid by past Americans--to be dedicated to this "immersion" program's purposes.

Like this comment
Posted by psmacintosh
a resident of Danville
on Jun 9, 2011 at 3:24 pm


Like this comment
Posted by psmacintosh
a resident of Danville
on Jun 10, 2011 at 9:25 am

Question: Are these "Korean language classes" separate from and in addition to the "Mandarin language immersion program" being developed in the San Ramon school?

My above comments were directed at, and in disagreement with, the introduction of the extensive "Mandarin language immersion program".

However, I didn't mean to state any opposition to the introduction of a new language class offering any language, Korean or otherwise, that enough students want to take/learn.

Like this comment
Posted by Mike
a resident of Danville
on Jun 10, 2011 at 9:50 pm

What's an American? An American can be of Native American, Irish, English, French, Asian Indian, Polish, Russian, African American, Mexican, Spanish, Japanese, Korean, and so on...ancestry. Remember the poem, written by Emma Lazarus, an American Jewish poet, and mounted inside the pedestal of that enduring symbol of America, the Statue of Liberty (which was a present to the US by the French, who were vital in the success of the American Revolution), "Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!" America is the melting pot. That is what makes our nation what it is--an incredible place to live, work and realize one's dream. America is like no other nation in the world.

Like this comment
Posted by Brett
a resident of Danville
on Jun 13, 2011 at 9:54 am

Well spoken, psmacintosh!!!

Common sense is not racist.

Continued deconstruction of US culture will result in less for all- not more for all.

Like this comment
Posted by Jessica Lipsky
a resident of Danville
on Jun 13, 2011 at 3:49 pm


The new Korean classes are separate from the dual-immersion program being introduced at Quail Run Elementary in the fall. The Korean classes aren't an immersion program and will be taught like Spanish and French classes.

Jessica Lipsky